Indeed.
Even if the PFE and SLTE are side-by-side inside a room at the CLS, the
physical connection between them typically happens inside the BMH (beach
manhole).
So provided you can run the Management traffic between the SLTE and PFE
optically, you can separate both devices as far as your
Thank you
I know SLTE can be further than 100m
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 06:26 Mark Tinka wrote:
> If the SLTE and PFE are not going to be co-located next to each other, the
> 2 main considerations are:
>
>- The Management signal between the SLTE and the PFE, which is
>generally ran over
If the SLTE and PFE are not going to be co-located next to each other,
the 2 main considerations are:
* The Management signal between the SLTE and the PFE, which is
generally ran over copper. So 100m becomes the distance limit.
However, you can mitigate this by doing media conversion
1 more repeater usually buys you 100km these days and thats negligible in terms
of wet plant repeater count, and entire countries in some cases on dry land.
So ‘no’, broadly.
-Ben
> On Dec 4, 2019, at 7:54 PM, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
>
>
> is there any limitation of where an SLTE can be
is there any limitation of where an SLTE can be placed in terms of distance
from PFE?
I have looked in to usual palaces and i was unable to confirm there is any
requirements for any distance. Any cons can you guys think of that you want
to share would be appreciated.
here are places I have
On 26/Nov/19 18:47, Ben Cannon wrote:
> Nowadays however, the CLS is looked at more like an ILA shelter, or
> when feasible cable landings are going directly into metro CNDCs as
> the physical gear is getting smaller and smaller and more suitable for
> colocation.
Nowadays, the SLTE sits in a
of power or more… That’s usually
kept out towards the sea.
-Ben Cannon
CEO 6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC
b...@6by7.net <mailto:b...@6by7.net>
> On Nov 4, 2019, at 1:50 PM, Ethan O'Toole wrote:
>
>> hey there,
>> we've put together a blog post about Virgini
On 8/Nov/19 00:45, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
> Seems logically similar to the reason why there are landing stations,
> but no noteworthy datacenters on the Oregon coast. Everything goes in
> various ring topology paths to Hillsboro/Portland. And routes that go
> more directly east to meet the fiber
in other areas West of Ashburn that are 2 hours or less
travelling by land. Less natural disaster risk. Virginia Beach has
hurricanes and is already pretty built out. Not sure how cheap the power
is, but most companies there are more interested in feeding off the large
Military presence
.
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 1:51 PM Ethan O'Toole wrote:
> > hey there,
> > we've put together a blog post about Virginia beach developments and how
> it can reshape some of the ways we
> > have been designing our networks.
> > https://www.infrapedia.com/post/virginia-beach-a
What about diversity from Ashburn?
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 13:50 Ethan O'Toole wrote:
> > hey there,
> > we've put together a blog post about Virginia beach developments and how
> it can reshape some of the ways we
> > have been designing our networks.
> > http
hey there,
we've put together a blog post about Virginia beach developments and how it can
reshape some of the ways we
have been designing our networks.
https://www.infrapedia.com/post/virginia-beach-a-new-hub-is-born
Mehmet
Ex-757'er (757 = Virginia Beach.)
Dead area tech wise. Bad job
hey there,
we've put together a blog post about Virginia beach developments and how it
can reshape some of the ways we have been designing our networks.
https://www.infrapedia.com/post/virginia-beach-a-new-hub-is-born
I would love to hear some feedback about this, feel free to contact me
13 matches
Mail list logo
