On 10/16/07, Jared Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 01:03:36PM -0400, Martin Hannigan wrote:
At 60 votes, that's .6% participation. If we don't hit at least 2, we
ought to seriously consider disbanding the current evolution.
If that means the disbanding of
Sean Figgins wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You've hit the nail on the head. Is there any way that the NANOG mailing
list can prevent such unwanted mail between two users?
Actually, yes there is.
This is using a hammer to swat a fly. Not only is it not the right tool,
but it's far
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Lynda wrote:
I'm on a couple of lists where the reply-to header is munged in just
this way. I hate it. I much prefer the extra effort that says to send to
the list, rather than constantly checking to make sure that a private
message is not being sent to the list by
