On 30 Oct 2007, at 16:21, Daniel Senie wrote:
At 12:07 PM 10/30/2007, Al Iverson wrote:
On 10/30/07, chuck goolsbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a more relevant and operational sort of note, it sure would be
nice if there were a NAMOG (North American Mail Operators Group) or
the like to
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 13:09 -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
On 30-Oct-2007, at 12:55, Andy Davidson wrote:
I would support the creation of a mail-operators list ( agenda time
for a mailops bof, since a lot of networks are small enough to mean
that netops and sysops are often the same guys) if
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-nanog-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Popovitch
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 10:27 AM
To: nanog-futures
Subject: Re: mail operators list
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 13:09 -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
On 30-Oct-2007, at
At 12:55 PM 10/30/2007, Andy Davidson wrote:
On 30 Oct 2007, at 16:21, Daniel Senie wrote:
At 12:07 PM 10/30/2007, Al Iverson wrote:
On 10/30/07, chuck goolsbee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a more relevant and operational sort of note, it sure would be
nice if there were a NAMOG (North
On 10/30/07, Joe Abley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30-Oct-2007, at 12:55, Andy Davidson wrote:
I would support the creation of a mail-operators list ( agenda time
for a mailops bof, since a lot of networks are small enough to mean
that netops and sysops are often the same guys) if it's
On 10/30/07, William B. Norton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, Martin Hannigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/30/07, Joe Abley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30-Oct-2007, at 12:55, Andy Davidson wrote:
I'm trying to understand your point here - you believe that it will be
a more
Martin Hannigan wrote:
What would work is for people to post on topic so that the list is
interesting and relevant.
Since what people want to talk about is mostly off-topic for the nanog@
list, does this mean that NANOG itself is no longer interested in being
the venue for network operators
Mail seems to be one of those topics which is of interest to many nanog
subscribers, but simultaneously annoying to many (presumably different)
nanog subscribers.
what large subject does not fall in this category? this is just life
when you have a large community.
randy
The NANOG mailing list has never been in good order.
The NANOG meetings have always had complaints.
The NANOG community is composed of disparate parties with disparate
interests, each convinced that their interests are the only ones of
operation relevance.
it would all be so much simpler
personally
i find prohibited to be unnecessarily strong.
sc hat on
looks pretty much as expected from meeting and discussion between sc and
mlc.
What do you see that's different from what the MLC initial vote
approved, what the community approved, and what you got?
10 matches
Mail list logo
