Forget what I said about Vegas. I was looking at it from a cost
perspective.
One item of note, the cost to attend the conference is the same no
matter where the venue. I am sure some venues are less expensive than
others. Maybe pricing should be based on the location.
There have been
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 11:56 AM
To: Christian Nielsen
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Reasons for attendance drop off
Forget what I said about Vegas. I was looking at it from a cost
perspective.
One item of note, the cost to attend the conference is the same
Randy Bush wrote:
Don Welch, Merit Network wrote:
Reducing to two meetings per year means we lose some economy of scale
and would have to raise the price further. Regardless, we looked at
this option and the SC felt there was a need for 3 meetings per year -
so here we are.
this statement is
On Nov 30, 2006, at 5:01 PM, Christian Nielsen wrote:
If the issue is to save costs for the attendees, IMHO the best place
would be Las Vegas during the non-peak travel dates.
Nanog Starts on Sundays and goes to Wednesdays.
Flights into and out of Vegas are not as full going in on Sunday
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 06:49:36PM -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Nov 30, 2006, at 5:01 PM, Christian Nielsen wrote:
If the issue is to save costs for the attendees, IMHO the best place
would be Las Vegas during the non-peak travel dates.
Nanog Starts on Sundays and goes to
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Steve Meuse wrote:
Joe Abley expunged ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I think this is definitely something worth pursuing (although I'm
going to display my ignorance of the US now and confess that I don't
know what the top 10 markets are).
They are also referred to as the NFL
What is the cause of attendance drop off? We seem to be treating the
symptoms extensively.
Indeed.
I have heard lots of handwaving about why attendance might be down,
but few ideas that are amenable to quantitative analysis. Several
possible reasons are being attended to, however (e.g.
I would support a reoccurring meeting in june at a common location.
However, I would highly object to ann arbor. I would think Chicago
would be ideal for travel and merit considerations. (Not just saying
that because I live in Chicago)
Chicago O'hare is one of the largest airports in the
Hi everyone:
For months now I have been trying to work on a hotel deal for Chicago. The
problem is, we need to start 2 years before we need the space...Ann Arbor
does not have a location big enough for NANOG... but we do have space in
near-by Dearborn/Detroit...:? Finding a sponsor or two
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Joe Abley wrote:
On 30-Nov-2006, at 17:15, Betty Burke wrote:
We should all remember though... the Top 10, including Chicago, will be a
bit more expensive, hotel contracts, and room rates to all of you.
I wonder whether we're looking at this the wrong way round.
Given
10 matches
Mail list logo
