On 10-Oct-2007, at 1256, Sean Figgins wrote:
Spam, on the other hand, always seemed to be a scarlet topic here.
If someone mentions spam or mail servers, there are those here that
start breathing fire and claiming that their email should not be
subject to spam filters. I don't know that
On 10 Oct 2007, at 17:56, Sean Figgins wrote:
Spam, on the other hand, always seemed to be a scarlet topic here.
If someone mentions spam or mail servers, there are those here that
start breathing fire and claiming that their email should not be
subject to spam filters. I don't know
On 10 Oct 2007, at 17:56, Sean Figgins wrote:
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
We talk a lot about what is on-topic. I get why there is a
question about botnets - they affect the network, but don't really
relate to routing, so there are arguments on both sides. I'm a
bit more confused about
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007, Sean Figgins wrote:
[adrian chadd]
These topics however seem altrustic ; why would someone talk about what
gives them an edge over their competitors?
If nobody ever talked about the above topics, then we would not have an
Internet today. Despite what CxOs may
Adrian Chadd wrote:
Today's networking area is very very different from where I'm sitting.
Networking can be learnt reasonably successful from a book and consultants
are called in when things aren't quite working right or its time for an upgrade.
I have not met many consultants that I would
