--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Sean Figgins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It kind of makes you think that NANOG is not really an organization, but
rather a collective. Since there are no real leaders<...>
I don't have a solution. Maybe one really isn't required. Is anything
really broken?
Michael Dillon wrote:
>> For example, as was discussed on the nanog list, why not
>> identify a BCP for identifying the appropriate contact at an
>> organization?
>
> If you can't get a significant level of participation in
> writing such BCPs, then people won't buy into them and
> won't follo
> Why can't the NANOG community identify and agree to adopt
> some BCPs that the group generally feel are good ideas?
Why? I think the reason why NANOG cannot do this is that
this kind of work is better done outside of a mailing list
and the NANOG community has not shown much interest in
doing it
