Hi Patrick,
Patrick W. Gilmore said the following on 25/2/08 11:00:
Let's stop dancing around the issue. There was discussion regarding
the Peering BoF amongst the SC PC. There is no reason to hide this
fact - just the opposite. And there were at least some provisional
outcomes
On 2/24/08, Patrick W. Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 24, 2008, at 4:19 AM, vijay gill wrote:
I would like the voice my support for the peering bof, it is by far
the most entertaining item at nanog. You cannot see this much level
of fail in one place, and for this reason alone,
--- On Tue, 2/26/08, vijay gill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Removing the BOF and or turning it into some sort
of overtly structured
environment would make it boring and not as
useful, which is bad.
then i suggest you not do it!
I am very against any such action. I wish to
