Re: [Nanog-futures] level of fail [was: The Peering BOF and the Fallout?]

[David Barak]

--- On Tue, 2/26/08, vijay gill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Removing the BOF and or turning it into some sort
> of overtly structured
> > > environment would make it boring and not as
> useful, which is bad.
> >
> >
> > then i suggest you not do it!
> 
> 
> 
> I am very against any such action. I wish to state for the
> record that I do
> NOT want oversight of the bof, the very spontaneity is what
> brings out the
> true value for me

This is the most violent agreement I've ever seen.

David Barak
Need Geek Rock?  Try The Franchise: 
http://www.listentothefranchise.com


      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 


_______________________________________________
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures