Agree 100% with Joe.
I think that determining who gets the nod might be a good task for the
Membership Committee.
- Dan
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> On 2010-09-20, at 11:02, Daniel Golding wrote:
>
>> The age requirement to be a fellow is more applicable to IEEE than
>
Agree with both Joe Abley's recommendation for limited number of fellows (no
more than one per meeting) nominated perhaps via the same method as PC
nominations?
Agree with Rose Klimovich's concerns as well regarding a finance committee
for eventual audits. -ren
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Jo
On 2010-09-20, at 11:02, Daniel Golding wrote:
> The age requirement to be a fellow is more applicable to IEEE than
> NANOG. Also, we don't know how old anyone is - the only observable
> data available is % of grey hair and degree of grouchiness, both of
> which are sadly inexact.
I can understa
A couple comments...
The age requirement to be a fellow is more applicable to IEEE than
NANOG. Also, we don't know how old anyone is - the only observable
data available is % of grey hair and degree of grouchiness, both of
which are sadly inexact.
I think there should be a codified budget and fin
