A couple comments... The age requirement to be a fellow is more applicable to IEEE than NANOG. Also, we don't know how old anyone is - the only observable data available is % of grey hair and degree of grouchiness, both of which are sadly inexact.
I think there should be a codified budget and finance committee, to provide forward looking budgets as well as audit capability. I think these are important things to codify in the bylaws. "8.10 Conference Attendance and Membership Board of Directors members must attend at least two out of every three NewNOG conferences. Board of Directors members must remain Members in Good Standing of NewNOG throughout their terms." Is this intentional? If we change the number of meetings to two (highly speculative, of course), what does this mean for this provision? It should still be ok, but wanted to check. - Dan On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Steve Feldman <feld...@twincreeks.net> wrote: > The NewNOG governance working group, chaired by Steve Gibbard, has published > a set of proposed bylaws for the corporation. These may be found at: > > http://www.newnog.org/docs/newnog-bylaws.pdf > > Please take a few minutes to review these and make any comments or > suggestions. > > There will be a question on the ballot during the NANOG election next month > to ratify these bylaws. Everyone eligible to vote in the NANOG election will > also be eligible to vote on this. > > Thanks, > Steve (for the NewNOG board) > > > _______________________________________________ > Nanog-futures mailing list > Nanog-futures@nanog.org > https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures > _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list Nanog-futures@nanog.org https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
