Re: [Nanog-futures] an alternate proposal for NewNOG ’s membership structure

2010-12-28 Thread Jay Hennigan
On 12/28/10 10:13 AM, laperriere.syl...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi, > > Early bird registrations provide cash flow to make hotel deposit commitments. > If all members get early birds rate and register at the last possible > minute, that dings the cash flow and increase liabilities for the organizer

Re: [Nanog-futures] an alternate proposal for NewNOG ’s membership structure

2010-12-28 Thread laperriere . sylvie
du réseau de Rogers Sans-fil -Original Message- From: Daniel Golding Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 11:51:09 To: Randy Bush Cc: Nanog Futures Subject: Re: [Nanog-futures] an alternate proposal for NewNOG ’s membership structure

Re: [Nanog-futures] an alternate proposal for NewNOG ’s membership structure

2010-12-18 Thread Daniel Golding
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > > bottom line: i do not think you should be disappointed in a model that > is conservative and estimates 200 paying members. i will be happy to > be wrong. > > randy > This. If we get 500 members, I'll be really happy. But if we get 200, it

Re: [Nanog-futures] an alternate proposal for NewNOG ’s membership structure

2010-12-17 Thread Randy Bush
> Would it help to think of it this way? > > If you're a member, you don't have to worry about making the > early registration deadline -- you always get it. or, there is no early registration discount. there is a late registration penalty. [ which is what it usually is, as late regs are more c

Re: [Nanog-futures] an alternate proposal for NewNOG ’s membership structure

2010-12-17 Thread Randy Bush
i see your point. not sure how you are suggesting to deal with it. i think there is basic physics behind only expecting 200 paying members. my model is that 0 there are a dozen or so people who actually DO a lot for the organization. they'll keep working and attending as long as they

Re: [Nanog-futures] an alternate proposal for NewNOG ’s membership structure

2010-12-17 Thread Kevin Oberman
Dan, I think you missed that I do want to keep people who do not come to meetings involved if they wish to and want to keep membership costs down as far as possible, but I don't want to lose participation of those spending several $K a year to attend meetings and balk at them paying for a membersh

Re: [Nanog-futures] an alternate proposal for NewNOG ’s membership structure

2010-12-17 Thread Daniel Golding
I must disagree to some degree - there are plenty of folks who participate in the mailing list but can't attend every meeting. These folks deserve a chance to fully participate. On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > I think that 200 may be a bit optimistic. Again, I worry tha

Re: [Nanog-futures] an alternate proposal for NewNOG ’s membership structure

2010-12-17 Thread Kevin Oberman
I think that 200 may be a bit optimistic. Again, I worry that this will move control of NewNOG away from those who really are most involved. In the past, the discussion was that the discount would (or credit towards registration) would be such that attending two meetings a year would take care of

Re: [Nanog-futures] an alternate proposal for NewNOG ’s membership structure

2010-12-17 Thread Daniel Golding
The math works out in funding. The membership line item is not a huge revenue item for the organization after year 2. Still, it does need to be big enough to provide buy-in, as you said. I'm sort of split on this. There certainly needs to be a discount, and folks who are members and attend all thr

Re: [Nanog-futures] an alternate proposal for NewNOG ’s membership structure

2010-12-17 Thread Jay Hennigan
On 12/17/10 10:34 AM, Duane Wessels wrote: > > On Dec 17, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Jay Hennigan wrote: > >> This proposal seems to state that if one registers early for a meeting >> the membership discount is forfeited. This doesn't seem right. > > > Would it help to think of it this way? > > If yo

Re: [Nanog-futures] an alternate proposal for NewNOG ’s membership structure

2010-12-17 Thread Duane Wessels
On Dec 17, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Jay Hennigan wrote: > This proposal seems to state that if one registers early for a meeting > the membership discount is forfeited. This doesn't seem right. Would it help to think of it this way? If you're a member, you don't have to worry about making the early

Re: [Nanog-futures] an alternate proposal for NewNOG ’s membership structure

2010-12-17 Thread Jay Hennigan
My only objection is if the early registration price and the membership discount can't be combined. I think that most of us use the early-bird registration option, it's not called a "discount" on the present website. This proposal seems to state that if one registers early for a meeting the membe

Re: [Nanog-futures] an alternate proposal for NewNOG ’s membership structure

2010-12-17 Thread Bill Norton
Steve - I like it - simple. Just to make sure I understand the thoughts behind the pricing model... With the membership fee at $100/year, if one attends all three NANOGs in a year, and gets a $25 per meeting discount, then the cost to be a member ends up costing about $25/year. Pretty cheap me

Re: [Nanog-futures] an alternate proposal for NewNOG ’s membership structure

2010-12-17 Thread David Barak
- Original Message From: Joe Abley On 2010-12-16, at 20:31, Steve Feldman wrote: > Please read the proposal (it's short!) and comment. I think this is great. +1 David Barak ___ Nanog-futures mailing list Nanog-futures@nanog.org ht

Re: [Nanog-futures] an alternate proposal for NewNOG ’s membership structure

2010-12-17 Thread Joe Abley
On 2010-12-16, at 20:31, Steve Feldman wrote: > Please read the proposal (it's short!) and comment. I think this is great. Joe ___ Nanog-futures mailing list Nanog-futures@nanog.org https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures

Re: [Nanog-futures] an alternate proposal for NewNOG ’s membership structure

2010-12-16 Thread Kevin Oberman
Steve, At last! Something that does not strike me as defective by design! Thank you. Based on the last financials I saw, I'd really like to see the discount on meetings be something more than $25. That mean $0 for those of us who register early. I would really hope that we can do better. -- R. K

Re: [Nanog-futures] an alternate proposal for NewNOG?s membership structure

2010-12-16 Thread Dorian Kim
This seems much more sensible than anything else I've seen in the past. -dorian On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 05:31:18PM -0800, Steve Feldman wrote: > In order to jump-start the process of defining a membership structure > for NewNOG, I wrote an alternative proposal. My goals were to keep it > as

Re: [Nanog-futures] an alternate proposal for NewNOG ’s membership structure

2010-12-16 Thread Joel Jaeggli
Satisfies all of my criticism with the previously proposed membership structure. joel On 12/16/10 5:31 PM, Steve Feldman wrote: > In order to jump-start the process of defining a membership structure > for NewNOG, I wrote an alternative proposal. My goals were to keep it > as simple and shor

Re: [Nanog-futures] an alternate proposal for NewNOG ’s membership structure

2010-12-16 Thread Randy Bush
> 1.2 Student discount > > Students enrolled in an undergraduate or graduate degree program > at an accredited institution will receive a 50% discount for annual > dues. Proof of enrollment is required. This may not be combined > with any other discount. often, in other groups, this has a full-

Re: [Nanog-futures] an alternate proposal for NewNOG?s membership structure

2010-12-16 Thread John Osmon
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 05:31:18PM -0800, Steve Feldman wrote: > In order to jump-start the process of defining a membership structure > for NewNOG, I wrote an alternative proposal. My goals were to keep it > as simple and short as possible, and address the concerns which came > up during th

[Nanog-futures] an alternate proposal for NewNOG ’s membership structure

2010-12-16 Thread Steve Feldman
In order to jump-start the process of defining a membership structure for NewNOG, I wrote an alternative proposal. My goals were to keep it as simple and short as possible, and address the concerns which came up during the election and afterwards. There are two parts, a Bylaws amendment to