Ah, good point. I'll try that today and see if it meets my needs.
Not sure if there is a nantcontrib list or not. I signed up for one, but
haven't gotten any mail from it since I signed up. And it appears that SF is
going through some issues with their mail archives, as sometimes I can get to
Are you any closer to releasing a new version 'proper'? The 0.7.9 release
is dated 11-jun-2002 - nearly 8 months ago. Is there anything in particular
that is holding the release up? Anything that I could lend a hand to?
Cheers
-MG
---
I am willing to pitch in as well. I would like to get a new release of
Nant and NAntContrib so that when they are downloaded, both will build
properly without hand-holding.
Regards,
Jay Turpin
Intel Corporation
The only difference between a problem and a solution is that people
understand the
Docs, Docs, Docs... Okay, here is what I see.
The code is very stable.
1.) I've got to make some quick changes so that we don't force the 1.0
framework, but that is pretty small.
2.) ChangeLog (We need to build this by hand from the cvs changes. This is
not a very attractive option, but I don't
Patrice,
I don't know if this has been fixed in the latest build (I haven't looked at the
issue), but I had to actually copy my library to the NAnt\bin directory (as an
NAnt copy task) and then run the NUnit2 Tasks to make this work. Obviously this
is not an optimal solution, but it's a
What can we do as a community to ensure that this
doesn't happen again?
I would say the best solution is for people to jump on board and volunteer
one of the tasks Scott outlined...
I think part of the problem is that it seems Scott is the only one of the
project admins that has been around
Ian, I've included the diff -u at the end of this message (finally). Can you
review and commit this or give me access to the project? I would like to see
this in the next release. My sourceforge username is asansone.
Thanks,
-Aaron
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 11:43:46 +1100
From: Ian
All,
I've made a change to the DeleteTask that I would like to have
reviewed/committed if you all agree with the change.
This issue I ran into was forcing a delete even if the file is read only. I
added a parameter force that will allow this. I also added code that would
recurse a directory
Kevin, you are correct, the only way to get this going is to have people
work on it. Assigning people tasks is a great way, but sometimes a little
challenging for projects of this nature. I'm a little hesitant to do as
everyone here is a limited volunteer. I was hoping that with a nightly build
Here are the results from my dry run using the latest nightly build.
Docs:
index.html
Still refers to the .net framework as a 'release candidate'
links.html
Could to with a link to Draco.NET ;)
changelog.html
Might be easier in the long run to ditch this, and switch to auto generated
change
Doc changes updated.
As for the examples, we have a problem with the VB.Net HelloWindowsForms
example. We should remove that one till we get it working. We should also
include some more, non-trivial, examples. Maybe something with multiple
build files. Anyone have any samples they would be
I was really calling for volunteers in areas of expertise and volunteering myself to
set an example. Of course I took one of the easy/optional tasks as I am lazy.
I am cool with the MSI Task. I will take a look at learning how it works. Of course
this is not a gate to a release.
Kevin
nant-developers, Protect Your Computer From Unwanted And Hazardous Viruses!!
Norton SystemWorks 2003 Software Suite (Promo-ROR835)
ALL FIVE - Feature-Packed Utilities For Only $39.99
! - Norton AntiVirus 2003
! - Norton Ghost 2003
! - GoBack 3 Personal Edition
! - Norton
About the next release - I'm all for releasing what we have right now.
Also, consider that last time the topic came up, I said the NUnit2 support
stuff was a showstopper, and I've since fixed it (what could be fixed
without changing NUnit itself).
I agree nunit2 is not a showstopper - but as
14 matches
Mail list logo
