Re: [nant-dev] servicecontroller task

2003-09-08 Thread Gert Driesen
After doing some more tests, I've come to the conclusion that I'll need to add the waittimeout attribute again, as I do need to make sure a service has reached the right status after I've performed an action on it ... so I should allow the user to configure how long the task can wait for a service

Re: [nant-dev] 0.8.3 final

2003-09-08 Thread Martin Aliger
I tend to agree with you. Corporate users don't really gel with the opensource style 0.x release numbers. Lets table up a list of things to target at a 1.0 and see how that looks. Right :) As I'm corporate developer as well, I mostly agree with Sascha. 1/ 1.0 should contains VS.NET addin.

Re: [nant-dev] [PATCH] New fileset option fromframework

2003-09-08 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Matthew Mastracci [EMAIL PROTECTED]; NAnt Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 11:55 AM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [PATCH] New fileset

Re: [nant-dev] 0.8.3 final

2003-09-08 Thread Ian MacLean
Martin Aliger wrote: Right :) As I'm corporate developer as well, I mostly agree with Sascha. 1/ 1.0 should contains VS.NET addin. Or maybe all NAntContrib? sure - the addin exists but it needs some love. Volunteers amyone ? 2/ definitelly * ensure documentation is complete of course. 3/

Re: [nant-dev] [PATCH] New fileset option fromframework

2003-09-08 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Matthew Mastracci [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]; NAnt Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 11:52 AM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [PATCH] New fileset