RE: [nant-dev] RE: RE: [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

2003-10-04 Thread Mitch Denny
Which version of the framework to run on is going to be a perennial problem. There are going to be features in the upcoming version of the .NET runtime which, if you guys choose to take advantage of them might force a fork in the code bases - I'm not sure what the Mono guys have plannned as far as

Re: [nant-dev] RE: RE: [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

2003-10-04 Thread Ian MacLean
Totally. I'm really looking forward to using generics when whitbey ships for example. However right now the codebase isn't usihng any 1.1 specific features. So I see no reason to exclude 1.0 users until we need specific features in a higher version. I can recall reading the same types of

[nant-dev] Error while testing

2003-10-04 Thread Sascha Andres
Hi, while building on a friends PC, we got an error NAnt could not delete a directory. We looked, but it *was* deleted successfully. The user has admin rights. The directory is located under the temp dir. I've attached the log. -sa -- sa at programmers-world dot com http://www.livingit.de

[nant-dev] Getting Started with Mono on Linux

2003-10-04 Thread Met @ Uber
I'm trying to get started with NAnt on Mono/Linux and am having some problems. I've been using Ant with Java for about a year now so I'm not lost in NAnts capabilities, but rather just how to set it up. How do I go about building NAnt, so that I can use it with Mono? And how do I setup my

RE: [nant-dev] RE: RE: [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

2003-10-04 Thread Mitch Denny
Hi Ian, True, right now its not a real issue provided NUnit 2.1 will happily compile onto version 1.1 of the framework. - Mitch Denny - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.monash.net - +61 (414) 610141 - -Original Message- From: Ian MacLean

[nant-dev] Getting Started with Mono on Linux [2] Continued

2003-10-04 Thread Met @ Uber
Perhaps you can ignore my last message as I think I'm getting somewhere, but not far. I modified the makefile.linux till it ran (the new file is attached). I'm getting two warnings but the compilation says it succeeded (how do I tell?). If it truly worked, should I have a file in bin called

RE: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

2003-10-04 Thread Mitch Denny
It would be great to see NUnit 2.1 plugged in. I'd also like to see 1.1 as the default. Ian - do you think it would be possible to get the ReplaceTask into the core if I can make it more robust? - Mitch Denny - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.monash.net -

Re: [nant-dev] Getting Started with Mono on Linux [2] Continued

2003-10-04 Thread Ian MacLean
Met, You're probably better off using the latest cvs of NAnt rather than 0.8.3. The build is cleaner on mono and there is now a nant shell script that gets copied to the build directory that you can run instead of 'mono NAnt.exe' get the cvs here :http://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=31650 or