[nant-dev] Re: NAnt Licensing question

2005-02-01 Thread Gerry Shaw
Yes, I think that exemption words exactly what I had in mind when licensing Nant. Ian, Gert, would you mind replacing the exemption clause in the license file and possibly on the web site when you have a free chance. I made a couple of tweaks to change the references from libraries to assembl

RE: [nant-dev] Building NAnt...

2005-02-01 Thread Gert Driesen
Giuseppe, I've committed workarounds for the Mono bug to cvs. Let me know if you run into other problems. Gert > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Gert Driesen > Sent: maandag 31 januari 2005 9:19 > To: 'Giuseppe Greco'; 'NAnt Deve

[nant-dev] [ nant-Bugs-1112631 ] nant from cvs does not compile with mono

2005-02-01 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #1112631, was opened at 2005-01-30 17:43 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by drieseng You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402868&aid=1112631&group_id=31650 Category: Tasks Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 S

Re: [nant-dev] Wierd Behavior from resgen.exe

2005-02-01 Thread Eric Fetzer
It fails about 59 out of 60 times. The error happens in one of several places in the build. I'm going to try it on another machine this afternoon and if it fails there also, I'll try to set up a build with manual resgen to just perform the operation where it normally happens and see if I can isol

[nant-dev] [ nant-Bugs-1113857 ] Project.Document object doesn't reflect buildfile includes

2005-02-01 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #1113857, was opened at 2005-02-01 10:31 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402868&aid=1113857&group_id=31650 Category: None Group: 0.85 Status: Open Resolution: None