And since our competetive product MSBuild do not work on 1.0/1.1 platform,
there could be some use of that.
For, me personally, same as Ryan apply.
Ing. Martin Aliger
martin_ali...@gordic.cz
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Boggs [mailto:rmboggs.obsd.po...@gmail.com]
Looking at the
Hey Charles,
You should make it clear if you want to drop sypport for .NET 1.x as a
runtime environment (CLR), or as a target framework.
Regards,
Gert
--
From: Charles Chan cchan...@users.sourceforge.net
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 4:20 AM
Thanks for all of your replies! Sorry, I am a little busy today, so please
excuse me for the quick answers.
Gert:
Based on my understanding: (please correct if I am wrong)
Requires .NET-1.0 SDK / VS2002 to target .NET-1.0 -- The SDK is no longer
available from MS, making it difficult to develop
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Charles Chan
cchan...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Thanks for all of your replies! Sorry, I am a little busy today, so please
excuse me for the quick answers.
Gert:
Based on my understanding: (please correct if I am wrong)
Requires .NET-1.0 SDK / VS2002
Ryan,
Roadmap
===
0.87 - bug fix only to stabilize the existing features; eg. Mono/.NET
compatibilities issues.
1.00 - golden release, perhaps last version to support .NET 1.0
2.00 - add support for .NET 2.0, 3.5; VS solution 2005, 2008; update NUnit,
etc.
Hey Charles,
I have no problem with dropping .NET 1.x as supported runtime, but I
definitely want to retain .NET 1.x as target framework.
There's no reason why we should drop support for that.
Regards,
Gert
-Original Message-
From: Charles Chan [mailto:cchan...@users.sourceforge.net]
