Re: [nant-dev] Just a suggestion...

2003-07-09 Thread Giuseppe Greco
>-- Original Message -- >From: Ian MacLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >CC: "'Giuseppe Greco'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Just a suggestion... >Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 10:58:16 +0900 >

Re: [nant-dev] Just a suggestion...

2003-07-09 Thread Ian MacLean
f Of Giuseppe Greco | Sent: Wednesday, 09 July, 2003 00:57 | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: [nant-dev] Just a suggestion... | | | Hi all, | | right now, the task takes the following | form: | | | | | | The task above doesn't test an 'assembly', but a &#x

RE: [nant-dev] Just a suggestion...

2003-07-09 Thread Anthony LoveFrancisco
What's your definition of "module" versus "assembly" ? - Ants | -Original Message- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On | Behalf Of Giuseppe Greco | Sent: Wednesday, 09 July, 2003 00:57 | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: [na

[nant-dev] Just a suggestion...

2003-07-09 Thread Giuseppe Greco
Hi all, right now, the task takes the following form: The task above doesn't test an 'assembly', but a 'module'. One can create single-module assemblies or multi-module assemblies, but a task always tests a module. So, I would suggest to rename the assemblyname property to module: