On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, Ian MacLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefan, do you recall the reasons for enforcing read-only on
> properties in Ant ?
Do you want the full story? 8-)
The short version: it happend to be that way in Ant 1.1 by accident
and we sticked to it because the majority of peopl
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, Mark Griffiths <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I tried a simple test case with Ant to determine if 3 is consistent,
> > and it differs in that Ant allows even "user" properties to be
> > overridden by a nested property element.
>
> Which version of Ant
On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, Mark Griffiths <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried a simple test case with Ant to determine if 3 is consistent,
> and it differs in that Ant allows even "user" properties to be
> overridden by a nested property element.
Which version of Ant? 1.5beta3 has finally gotten it
Scott Hernandez wrote:
> FYI: The basedir attribute was removed from NAntTask before the 0.7.9.0
> release. It was removed may 3rd.
We incorrectly assumed that the basedir attribute had not yet been
implemented. So we added it and then independently discovered that is was
not required! ;) It's
