RE: [nant-dev] FxCop & RegSvcs Tasks

2003-08-14 Thread Arjen Poutsma
Ok, I think I get it now :-). Basically, you want a fxcop task that can be used as follows: Which only checks the assemblies defined in the project file against the rules defined in the project file. Which checks the assemblies in the targets fileset agai

RE: [nant-dev] FxCop & RegSvcs Tasks

2003-08-14 Thread Arjen Poutsma
t file, like so: But I don't think we can combine this with any of the attributes described above. Do these changes make it more useful? Best, Arjen > -Original Message- > From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 9:42 PM > To: Ar

RE: [nant-dev] FxCop & RegSvcs Tasks

2003-08-14 Thread Erv Walter
use a rules assembly, but turn off a couple specific rules from that assembly. These are also stored in the project file. -Original Message- From: Arjen Poutsma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 3:37 AM To: Gert Driesen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [nant-dev] F

RE: [nant-dev] FxCop & RegSvcs Tasks

2003-08-14 Thread Gert Driesen
ith any of the attributes > described above. I agree. > > Do these changes make it more useful? I don't think so ... Really I urge you to use your task on some "production" assemblies and I'm pretty sure you won't find one that doesn't violate any

Re: [nant-dev] FxCop & RegSvcs Tasks

2003-08-14 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi Arjen, Good to see someone finally took the time to implement these tasks, great work However, I'm not sure the FxCop task is very useful as you've implemented it, but I could be wrong ofcourse ... I think we could actually start from an existing FxCop project file as it doesn't make sense to