s but uses enums for BuildType and
> >RevisionType (making it a breaking change).
> >
> >Let me know if you think its ok.
> >
> >Gert
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] O
>-Original Message-
>From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 10:14 AM
>To: Morris, Jason; nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: RE: [nant-dev] Request for version task patch be
>committed (#1083618)
>
>Hi J
PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Morris, Jason
> Sent: donderdag 30 december 2004 7:39
> To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [nant-dev] Request for version task patch be
> committed (#1083618)
>
> Has any committers had a chance to look at this yet? Is
age-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
>Of Morris, Jason
>Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 8:25 AM
>To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: RE: [nant-dev] Request for version task patch be
>committed (#1083618)
>
>Nant or nantcont
Nant or nantcontrib developers,
I know that recent work is focused on getting .85 out the door, but if
anyone could commit this patch, I would be much appreciated. I know
that it isn't much of a patch.
Also, the patch was submitted to the nant patches instead of the
nantcontrib patches...sorry.
