>From: "Jamie Briant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 12:49 AM
> The first is dangerous because when a programmer decides to change
some
> build.config's to build.local.config (for example) they are
guaranteed
> at some point to miss one. Not every time. Not even very often
Hi Jamie,
We listen to our "customers", so we've decided to no longer mark that
attribute as deprecated.
Gert
- Original Message -
From: "Jamie Briant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 2:56 AM
Subject: [nant-dev] property overwrite attrib
Does this not seem out
sing, may I suggest a new option be put
in its place that has the same effect, such as "overwriteexisting", or
"lookmeupinthemanual".
Jamie
-Original Message-
From: Troy Laurin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 9:33 PM
To: Jamie Briant
Cc: nant-
Jamie Briant wrote:
Does this not seem outstandingly dangerous to anyone?
Its just asking for errors where only one of the “build.config”’s is
changed. Is there a good reason that the following is deprecated?
James,
I'm not sure why the first would be dangerous but the second
