On 16.09.2006, at 06:40, Ibrahim Tannir wrote:
So a porting guide is is becoming necessary (?).
Perhaps... but at this point we have no need for that, yet.
I just wanted to stress that such thing will be inevitable
in the future.
So a porting guide is is becoming necessary (?).
-Ibrahim
Unrelatred:
We are now pretty much drifting away in terms of functionality
and API from our sister project, but nothing is for free. I guess
we are pretty different in other areas so people eventually moving
to our platform will have qui
On 14.09.2006, at 22:30, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
yes,per pool is safer
Allright. All is done and checked in. The ns_proxy.man is
also updated accordingly.
Unrelatred:
We are now pretty much drifting away in terms of functionality
and API from our sister project, but nothing is for free. I guess
On 15.09.2006, at 18:41, Rick Cobb wrote:
Been there, done that, shredded the t-shirt in the dryer --
I'm absolutely convinced!
Uh, I don't feel real strongly about this, but I'd recommend against it.
I worked for a company (now long absorbed into a much larger company)
which named all of its products with lower case letters at the beginning
(uh, and I was the guy who suggested it :-/). While it made the logos
stand out, a
> > We use ns_ prefix which means N and S should be capitalized in
> > NaviServer i guess
>
> I know... but: why not stepping out of the circle?
> This is all marketing. I'm wondering how would:
>
>naviServer
>
> look like!
My colleague is out of the office right now, but I'll ask him for
the
On 15.09.2006, at 15:35, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
We use ns_ prefix which means N and S should be capitalized in
NaviServer i guess
I know... but: why not stepping out of the circle?
This is all marketing. I'm wondering how would:
naviServer
look like!
We use ns_ prefix which means N and S should be capitalized in
NaviServer i guess
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On 15.09.2006, at 14:10, Bernd Eidenschink wrote:
What about
naviServer
instead of
NaviServer
?
How would this look like?
(BTW I like the things with borders better).
Cheers
On 15.09.2006, at 14:10, Bernd Eidenschink wrote:
What about
naviServer
instead of
NaviServer
?
How would this look like?
(BTW I like the things with borders better).
Cheers
Zoran
Borders version looks better IMHO
Bernd Eidenschink wrote:
just a quick shot to make the web nicer, what do you think?
and some variations with borders.
Bernd.
> just a quick shot to make the web nicer, what do you think?
and some variations with borders.
Bernd.
<><><><>
Hi there,
just a quick shot to make the web nicer, what do you think?
See attachments.
Bernd.
<><><>
On 15.09.2006, at 08:23, Gustaf Neumann wrote:
On a power5+ with linux and gcc, int stays at 32bit even with 64bit
code.
Yes, this is what I also read everywhere. The int should stay 32bit
even on 64bit boxes otherwise the porting effort might be a
nightmare for just about everybody.
13 matches
Mail list logo
