This is most probably the best variabt so far, and not complicated, such a
optimizer can do the right thing easily. sorry for the many versions..
-gustaf
{ unsigned register int s = (size-1) 3;
while (s1) { s = 1; bucket++; }
}
if (bucket NBUCKETS) {
bucket = NBUCKETS;
Am 16.01.2007 um 10:37 schrieb Stephen Deasey:
Can you import this into CVS? Top level.
You mean the tclThreadAlloc.c file on top-level
of the naviserver project?
Am 16.01.2007 um 12:18 schrieb Stephen Deasey:
vtmalloc -- add this
It's there. Everybody can now contribute, if needed.
On 1/16/07, Stephen Deasey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/16/07, Zoran Vasiljevic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 16.01.2007 um 12:18 schrieb Stephen Deasey:
vtmalloc -- add this
It's there. Everybody can now contribute, if needed.
Rocking.
I suggest putting the 0.0.3 tarball up on
Am 16.01.2007 um 15:41 schrieb Stephen Deasey:
I suggest putting the 0.0.3 tarball up on sourceforge, announcing on
Freshmeat, and cross-posting on the aolserver list. You really want
random people with their random workloads on random OS to beat on
this. I don't know if the pool of people
Yes, it is combined version, but Tcl version is slightly different and
Zoran took it over to maintain, in my tarball i include both, we do
experiments in different directions and then combine best results.
Also the intention was to try to include it in Tcl itself.
Stephen Deasey wrote:
On
Gustaf Neumann wrote:
This is most probably the best variabt so far, and not complicated, such a
optimizer can do the right thing easily. sorry for the many versions..
-gustaf
{ unsigned register int s = (size-1) 3;
while (s1) { s = 1; bucket++; }
}
if (bucket
Hi Jeff,
we are aware that the funciton is essentially an integer log2.
The chosen C-based variant is acually faster and more general than
what you have included (it needs only max 2 shift operations for
the relevant range) but the assembler based variant is hard to beat
and yields another 3%
