On 5/21/07, Bernd Eidenschink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just (dist-)compiled on an Ubuntu 7.04, tomorrow I'll give it a try on a
SuSE Enterprise Linux (all 32bit).
tomorrow never dies...
I just dist-compiled on the SuSE Enterprise and it was all smooth jazz.
Anyone test on a FreeBSD box
a)
The test program Zoran includes biases Zippy toward standard
allocator, which it does not do for VT. The following patch
corrects this behavior:
+++ memtest.c Sun Jan 14 16:43:23 2007
@@ -211,6 +211,7 @@
} else {
size = 0x3FFF; /* Limit to 16K */
I've been on a search for an allocator that will be fast
enough and not so memory hungry as the allocator being
built in Tcl. Unfortunately, as it mostly is, it turned
out that I had to write my own.
Vlad has written an allocator that uses mmap to obtain
memory for the system and munmap that
On 9/25/06, Zoran Vasiljevic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unix is not Unix as I see...
Please note this (interesting) document:
http://developers.sun.com/solaris/articles/event_completion.html
Mostly interesting, as there is now a very powerful and scalable
notification interface on both
On 9/17/06, Zoran Vasiljevic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following a recent discussion on the sister-project, I just wanted
to check what would you think about integrating javascript as an
alternate language to Tcl ?
I'm long time user of Tcl (over 12 years) and I still preffer it
to any other
On 9/8/06, Michael A. Cleverly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just discovered the existence of NaviServer last night (courtesy of
http://wiki.tcl.tk/2090). I don't know where I've been living for the
past year... but wow, I'm seriously impressed and extremely excited
about the existance of this
On 9/8/06, Zoran Vasiljevic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 08.09.2006, at 21:39, Michael A. Cleverly wrote:
I just discovered the existence of NaviServer last night (courtesy of
http://wiki.tcl.tk/2090). I don't know where I've been living for the
past year... but wow, I'm seriously impressed
On 9/8/06, Zoran Vasiljevic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 08.09.2006, at 21:57, Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
How is this different/better than what we have now?
FYI... I'm kind of a special server user as we do not
use the DB interface, nor ADP (we have developed our
own db-intgerace and tdom-based
On 9/7/06, Vlad Seryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not insisting on doing it the way i did but it seemed to me very
logical and not breaking overall NS architecture or model.
But of course, suggestions are welcome, this is development version
under discussion.
My 2c: I like Stephen's
On 8/23/06, Zoran Vasiljevic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23.08.2006, at 17:20, Andrew Piskorski wrote:
That's only necessary to preserve the current ns_config
case-insensitivity, right? Wouldn't it be easier to just canonicalize
the key values on both write and read? E.g., create a
On 8/23/06, Zoran Vasiljevic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23.08.2006, at 18:35, Mike wrote:
I do have one concern with this change - what happens when the value
(where case must be preserved) for some key is actually the name of
another section or key? I do not have enough experience
OT: anyone else find the signature strange? ;)
On 8/14/06, Michael Lex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps, it is even better to include a default OutputCharset (utf-8),
when reading the configuration. I think the right place would be
NsUpdateEncodings, but i can be wrong ;-)
Michael
Right now I am
looking at 4 choices:
1) drop nsdb from naviserver and use nstcl after cleaning up any
multi-thread issues
2) import ad_proc and 00-database from OACS and hack them up until
they work. (unfortunately the combination of the two is not possible
- nstcl ad_proc does not
My Fedora box has automake-1.4 automake-1.5 automake-1.6
automake-1.7 automake-1.9, but it also has plain 'automake', which is
the 1.9 version.
I guess we need something like:
$ AUTOMAKE=automake-1.9 ./autogen.sh
perhaps autogen.sh could be made to look for automake, then
automake-1.9,
On 7/22/06, Vlad Seryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nstk is quite old and i have not updated in for a long time.
Can you describe what was not pleasant and what was terrible, i may work
on that to improve it.
Vlad,
I am familiar with OpenACS database API. I am used to it. nstk is
very
On 7/22/06, Vlad Seryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree, actually i have foreach command in OSSWEB and i do not know why
it is not included in to nstk, let me add it. Also, tell me if what kind
of functionality you would like to see in nstk without make it bloated
or big. I know it is very
The following patch is needed to get naviserver CVS to build on
FreeBSD... Almost certainly this is not something to commit, but in
case someone comes across this post, it'll save them 10 minutes...
(or someone will point out to me that there's an easier way :) )
Index: autogen.sh
All,
I am unable to find SSL support in the code. There is a #define
NS_DRIVER_SSL , however it does not appear to be providing the TLS/SSL
capabilities, just changing the default parameter values for the
driver. Am I looking in the wrong place?
Two unrelated questions...
The project for which I am considering NS will have a dynamic and very
large static part. There will be many very large (650MB) static files
that people will download. It is hard for me to judge what the
performance of serving these files with NS will be. Of course
Async IO i mean, writer thread does loop and sends as much as possible
chunks from the files, same way as driver thread reads multiple chunks
of requests from multiple clients. sendfile blocks, so you will need 10
threads for 10 clients at the same time, in case of writer thread, it
can alone
On 7/12/06, Vlad Seryakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could be wrong, never used sendfile before.
The code you can check is driver.c, WriterThread, and bufsize parameter
can be used to define buffer.
Excerpt from sendfile(2) on FreeBSD:
When using a socket marked for non-blocking I/O,
21 matches
Mail list logo
