Hi Dirk and Wim,
in the end, at least for now, we have chosen the Nebula Grid.
However let me congratulate with both of you for your great work, including
the latest releases, both on Nebula 1.2.0 and NatTable 1.5.0
Cheers
Vincenzo
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 6:12 AM, Dirk Fauth
>
>>
>>
>> http://markmail.org/message/7fcad6ofm3vbex5p#query:+page:1+
>> mid:oypkofpqvfnfsfuv+state:results
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>
>>
>> Wim
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* nebula-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Wim
>
>
>
> *From:* nebula-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:nebula-dev-bounces@
> eclipse.org] *On Behalf Of *Dirk Fauth
> *Sent:* maandag 6 februari 2017 21:12
> *To:* Nebula Dev
> *Subject:* Re: [nebula-dev] NetTable & RAP
: maandag 6 februari 2017 21:12
To: Nebula Dev
Subject: Re: [nebula-dev] NetTable & RAP
To be honest, I can't remember anymore. But probably reading the configuration
on rendering constantly.
As I am not familiar with RAP, therefore I can't tell anything. And it was
years ago when I was last conta
To be honest, I can't remember anymore. But probably reading the
configuration on rendering constantly.
As I am not familiar with RAP, therefore I can't tell anything. And it was
years ago when I was last contacted on that topic by someone from the RAP
team.
There was a discussion about 5 years
What architecture would that be? You are calling the back-end many times
because of the layers?
Cheers,
Wim
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Dirk Fauth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The short answer is no. The RAP team once said that the architecture does
> not match.
>
> I never made
Hi all,
we at RCP Vision would like to use the NatTable in RAP.
Are there any resource on some effort spent in this direction (a minimal
example or so)?
Thank you very much in advance.
Vincenzo
___
nebula-dev mailing list
nebula-dev@eclipse.org
To