Thank you for your fast answer.
I don't think this is a bad idea but I think that we can do better.
I mean, if I have to use two different ports to distinguish writing and
reading requests, I also have to open and handle these two ports on my
network etc... This multiply the work by 2.
This is a
Hello,
I think that is a fine solution you are proposing; it is similar to what I
wrote up in the manual here:
http://neo4j.com/docs/stable/ha-haproxy.html#_optimizing_for_reads_and_writes
Why do you think it is a bad idea?
- Lasse
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 12:00 PM, FakeGenius
wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
Firstly, I have to say that my English isn't very good so please be lenient
:).
So i explain my problem: we have one cluster of Neo4J servers. One master
and 2 or more slaves.
I also use an HAProxy server to do the load balancing. Writing request goes
to the master and reading requests goe
