Well, you would really need two of those in perfect sync at start time to
do the time-dilation measurement. If you want to implement the second one
you will need a method to compensate for the communication delay when you
do the measurement in real time. And a really good back support.
However I
4sure!!!
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020, 11:45 PM gregebert wrote:
> Definitely a must-have if you want to measure your time-dilation on a long
> airplane flight, or perhaps when climbing a very tall mountain ?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups
Definitely a must-have if you want to measure your time-dilation on a long
airplane flight, or perhaps when climbing a very tall mountain ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails f
Actually even crystal oscillators start to lose time in hours... A rubidium
can holdover for days and a cesium can holdover for more days... None are
perfect. Cesium 133 resonates between different energy states
9,192,631,770 times each second with almost no variation. So a clock that
ticks to tha
It's really a matter of what you want for a reference. A
Rubidium/Cesium/whatever reference will give you a very stable 10Mhz timing
reference, but it *wont* give you the official time-of-day. Every so often,
there are corrections to official world time and if you're using a stable
timing refer
> Do you think this can feed my Nixie clocks?
Bill, yes, have a look at: http://leapsecond.com/pages/atomic-nixie/
/tvb
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an em
