Hi,
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Pavel Rappo wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Here's an updated webrev with the latest implementation:
>
>http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8087113/webrev.04/
Can you please summarize what's different from the previous ?
I had a very quick
Strictly speaking, not sending a Pong for every Ping is not against the
protocol
semantics [1]:
If an endpoint receives a Ping frame and has not yet sent Pong
frame(s) in response to previous Ping frame(s), the endpoint MAY
elect to send a Pong frame for only the most recently processed
Hi Michael,
Looks fine.
Editorial:
test/java/net/httpclient/http2/java.httpclient/java/net/http/Http2TestExchange.java
Line 8: wildcard import unnecdssary when only using SSLSession
test/java/net/httpclient/http2/java.httpclient/java/net/http/Http2TestServerConnection.java
Line 34:
Simple change to set default use of TLSv1.2 when the user
has not specified which protocols to use.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8153572/webrev.1/
The change is in HttpClientImpl.java but also includes some logging
additions.
Thanks
Michael
On 3 May 2016, at 16:23, Pavel Rappo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here's an updated webrev with the latest implementation:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prappo/8087113/webrev.04/
This looks much better, more straight forward.
I will ignore any TODO’s and items mentioned in
> On 5 May 2016, at 00:20, Jitendra Kotamraju wrote:
>
> * I see that there is an issue for autoponging. May be this falls under it.
> The default impl of onPing() doesn't send PONG for *every* received PING.
Yes, that's correct. The default implementation sends a Pong in
Another occasional test case failure. It's a concurrent modification
exception caused
by modifying a list during processing of the list (by the same thread).
The solution
is to keep separate lists of the modifications and to process them after
the iterator
completes.
On 4 May 2016, at 23:59, Michael McMahon wrote:
> I've just updated the webrev at
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8155928/webrev.3
>
> to retry the tests in the unlikely event of a BindException
Thanks Michael. This looks ok.
-Chris.
> - Michael
>
>