> On 27 Sep 2016, at 03:08, Felix Yang wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>please review following test fix.
>
> Bug:
>
>https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8154525
>
> Webrev:
>
>http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xiaofeya/8154525/webrev.00/
>
> This test has been observed to fail sometimes w
On 27 Sep 2016, at 01:02, Mark Sheppard wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>changes look reasonable …
+1
> perhaps align the two additions below the existing ERROR_XXX set, all neat
> and tidy :-)
+1
-Chris.
> regards
> Mark
>
> On 27/09/2016 00:09, Rob McKenna wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Looking for a
Christoph,
On 26 Sep 2016, at 18:58, Langer, Christoph wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> I agree with your comment on the NPE. It would probably be wrong. So I
> restored the old code and also removed the comments suggesting the NPE. Here
> is my new webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs
Hi Chris,
updated as suggested
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xiaofeya/8154525/webrev.01/
Thanks,
Felix
On 2016/9/27 15:55, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 27 Sep 2016, at 03:08, Felix Yang wrote:
Hi all,
please review following test fix.
Bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-815
On 27 Sep 2016, at 09:25, Felix Yang wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
>updated as suggested
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xiaofeya/8154525/webrev.01/
Looks good to me.
Up to you, but with the thread join ( if my hunch is correct ) we may not
actually need othervm, but of course it should be fine
Chris,
I will push without othervm
-Felix
On 2016/9/27 16:29, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 27 Sep 2016, at 09:25, Felix Yang wrote:
Hi Chris,
updated as suggested
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xiaofeya/8154525/webrev.01/
Looks good to me.
Up to you, but with the thread join ( if my hunch
On 27 Sep 2016, at 09:35, Felix Yang wrote:
>
> Chris,
>
>I will push without othervm
Thanks. If we see future issues with this test, then we can add it back.
-Chris.
> -Felix
> On 2016/9/27 16:29, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>> On 27 Sep 2016, at 09:25, Felix Yang wrote:
>>> Hi Chris,
>>>
>>>
Hi team,
Could you please review small fix for regression tests.
BugID: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8166791
WebRev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~skovalev/8166791/webrev.00/
Issue: Severl network related tests failed in case of using
"--limit-modules java.base" command line option.
Chris,
thanks for your input.
If there's no objections I'd push it like this later tomorrow:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8166584.2/
I've replaced the JNU_JAVANETPKG and JNU_JAVAIOPKG macros with the full
exception class names.
Best regards
Christoph
> -Original Message
> On 27 Sep 2016, at 19:56, Langer, Christoph wrote:
>
> Chris,
>
> thanks for your input.
>
> If there's no objections I'd push it like this later tomorrow:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8166584.2/
Looks ok to me Christoph.
Thanks,
-Chris.
> I've replaced the JNU_JAVANETPKG
10 matches
Mail list logo