Hi Kurchi,
Thanks. Is it eligible for committing?
Best regards,
Frank
On 1/23/2013 4:45 PM, Kurchi Subhra Hazra wrote:
Looks good to me.
Thanks,
Kurchi
On 1/22/13 6:50 PM, Frank Ding wrote:
Hi Chris and Kurchi,
Thank you both for your comments. I have reformatted the patch
:20 AM, Frank Ding wrote:
Hi Chris,
Thanks for your review. I did jtreg test on net module (java/net
and sun/net) and no regression issue was found. Could anybody else
review the patch as well?
Best regards,
Frank
On 1/18/2013 10:55 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
I haven't been able to spe
Frank Ding wrote:
Hi Michael,
Could you please take a look at my comment below?
Best regards,
Frank
On 1/6/2013 4:23 PM, Frank Ding wrote:
Hi Michael,
After reading carefully discussion thread, let me elaborate my
investigation and conclusion.
The 2nd version of Shirish's patch tries to ad
Hi Michael,
Could you please take a look at my comment below?
Best regards,
Frank
On 1/6/2013 4:23 PM, Frank Ding wrote:
Hi Michael,
After reading carefully discussion thread, let me elaborate my
investigation and conclusion.
The 2nd version of Shirish's patch tries to address
Hi all,
I'd like to request for approval to push the following change into 7u11.
Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6512101
Changeset in jdk8
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/883feced1cdd
Reviewed by chegar, dsamersoff
Webrev for 7u
http://cr.openjdk.java.net
Hi Michael,
After reading carefully discussion thread, let me elaborate my
investigation and conclusion.
The 2nd version of Shirish's patch tries to address your concern that
"Would it be possible to fix this within the context of whatever loader
is currently being invoked?". The new solut
Thanks Jonathan.
On 12/11/2012 10:44 AM, Jonathan Lu wrote:
Hi Frank,
Patch pushed @ http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/883feced1cdd
Best regards!
- Jonathan
On 12/11/2012 09:49 AM, Frank Ding wrote:
Hi All,
Thank you all. I will have Jonathan help to commit.
Best regards
? Otherwise, just let me
know and I can do it.
-Chris.
-Dmitry
On 2012-12-10 12:00, Frank Ding wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
I updated wording accordingly @
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dingxmin/6512101/webrev.03. It is now
changed to "Cannot get multibyte char for interface display name".
What
ood for me.
May be "Can't get WIDE string" should be changed to something more verbose.
-Dmitry
On 2012-12-10 11:40, Frank Ding wrote:
Hi Dmitry and Chris,
Could you please review the second revision again?
Thanks and Best regards,
Frank
On 11/29/2012 1:08 PM, Frank Ding wr
Hi Dmitry and Chris,
Could you please review the second revision again?
Thanks and Best regards,
Frank
On 11/29/2012 1:08 PM, Frank Ding wrote:
Hi Dmitry and Chris,
Thanks for your comments. With your comments incorporated, I've
prepared v2 @
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dingxmin/65
or if
MultiByteToWideChar return error, rather than abort.
I agree with Dmitry, fall back would be preferable. Can you make the
changes and post an updated webrev.
-Chris.
-Dmitry
On 2012-11-07 13:08, Frank Ding wrote:
Hi guys,
Could you please take a look at patch below aimed to re
Hi guys,
Could you please take a look at patch below aimed to resolve existing
bug http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6512101 ?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dingxmin/6512101/webrev.01/
I happen to have a Chinese Win 7 environment. "buggy.png" is current
output of test cas
Hi Chris and Jonathan,
Thank you all. The change set is OK.
Best regards,
Frank
On 8/17/2012 5:20 PM, Jonathan Lu wrote:
On 08/17/2012 04:14 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 16/08/12 10:21, Frank Ding wrote:
Hi Chris and Alan,
Thank you for taking time to help this issue. I have built
On 8/14/2012 10:42 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 14/08/12 13:11, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 14/08/2012 04:11, Frank Ding wrote:
On 8/7/2012 1:46 PM, Frank Ding wrote:
:
Could anybody take a look at my patch below and make comment?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~youdwei/ojdk-533/webrev.00/
Thanks
On 8/7/2012 1:46 PM, Frank Ding wrote:
Hi all,
In source code
"jdk\src\solaris\native\java\net\PlainDatagramSocketImpl.c", there are
several macros in the form of
#ifdef AF_INET6
#if defined(__solaris__) || defined(MACOSX)
// code for solaris and macosx (unix) [1]
#en
Hi all,
In source code
"jdk\src\solaris\native\java\net\PlainDatagramSocketImpl.c", there are
several macros in the form of
#ifdef AF_INET6
#if defined(__solaris__) || defined(MACOSX)
// code for solaris and macosx (unix) [1]
#endif
#ifdef __linux__
// code for linux
#endif
#else
16 matches
Mail list logo
