Re: RFR 8179602: Fix for JDK-8165437 is broken on 32-bit Linux

> On 4 May 2017, at 17:58, Michael McMahon wrote: > > Hi Vyom, > > As discussed, I think there are still some issues including on 32 bit Linux > and since we don't > have too many of those machines left to debug with, it's probably best to > back out the

Re: RFR 8179602: Fix for JDK-8165437 is broken on 32-bit Linux

Hi Vyom, As discussed, I think there are still some issues including on 32 bit Linux and since we don't have too many of those machines left to debug with, it's probably best to back out the original change, and go back to the original webrev. We can then review an updated version which takes

Re: RFR 8179602: Fix for JDK-8165437 is broken on 32-bit Linux

Hi All, please find the latest webrev(http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vtewari/8179602/webrev0.1/index.html) which fixed the Mac OS issued as well. Michael as we we discussed off line, i incorporated the changes suggested by you, Thanks, Vyom On Thursday 04 May 2017 03:11 PM, Michael

Re: RFR 8179602: Fix for JDK-8165437 is broken on 32-bit Linux

Hi Vyom, I notice this doesn't seem to fix the Mac OS problem. We may have to file a separate issue for that. - Michael On 04/05/2017, 09:50, Vyom Tewari wrote: Hi All, Please review the below change. Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vtewari/8179602/webrev0.0/index.html Bugid:

RFR 8179602: Fix for JDK-8165437 is broken on 32-bit Linux

Hi All, Please review the below change. Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vtewari/8179602/webrev0.0/index.html Bugid: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8179602 This issue is because of side effect of "JDK-8165437" where we are using "JVM_NanoTime" which returns a 64 bit jlong and