On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 01:03:21 +0100 Richard wrote:
RM> I did a bit of investigation on the issue and came up with the following
RM> patch. It uses the C99 macro SCNuMAX to get the appropriate scan
RM> specifier for uintmax_t. How does that look?
I hadn't see that macro before. It is just what we ne
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 11:17:36 +0500 Juwairia wrote:
JZ> hi again
JZ> Now as per the instructions i did the following
JZ> rpm -i net-snmp-5.1.2-1.src.rpm
JZ> rpmbuild -bb /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/net-snmp.spec
JZ> cd /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386
JZ> rpm --force -Uvh net-snmp-5.1.2-1.i386.rpm
You didn't in
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 13:49:34 -0700 Fong wrote:
FT> Currently if snmpd agent is launched on IPv6 transport, both IPv6 and IPv4
FT> addresses can access it. However, access control in snmpd.conf
FT> distinguishes between IPv6 (eg. rwcommunity6) and IPv4(eg. rwcommunity). If
FT> snmpd is launched IPv6
