Regarding hrStorageTable

2005-09-08 Thread Naganarasimha
The mibs which come under    “iso.org.dod.internet.mgmt.mib-2”  should it be available irrespective of any OS?   I am asking this because I am not getting values of hrStorageSize and hrStorageUsed values( present in hrStorageTable) for SUSE 9.0. If not is there any other way to find out

RE: Regarding hrProcessorLoad

2005-09-08 Thread Naganarasimha
This Mib OID “hrProcessorLoad“ even though it doesn’t come under private its not there in Suse linux 8 and 9. And hence I am not able to find the CPU utilization in these machines. Is there any other way I can find for these two OS.     And B/w   For some of the systems which has wi

Re: Are the debug tokens categorised???

2005-09-08 Thread Thomas Anders
Dave Shield wrote on 2004-08-23(!): Dave> But one of the major tasks is to go through the existing debug statements Dave> and come up with a suitable hierarchical debug token structure. Dave> (Plus identifying where we really ought to have debugging statements, Dave> but don't!) Volunteers grat

Re: CVS MAIN broken

2005-09-08 Thread Thomas Anders
Robert Story wrote: On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 12:11:29 +0100 Dave wrote: DS> On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 12:52 +0200, Thomas Anders wrote: DS> > CVS MAIN is broken for me (on Linux/x86). "make test" fails, because the DS> > agent crashes badly. DS> > DS> > Anyone else seeing this? DS> DS> Yup - I'm seeing

Re: CVS MAIN broken

2005-09-08 Thread Robert Story
On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 12:11:29 +0100 Dave wrote: DS> On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 12:52 +0200, Thomas Anders wrote: DS> > CVS MAIN is broken for me (on Linux/x86). "make test" fails, because the DS> > agent crashes badly. DS> > DS> > Anyone else seeing this? DS> DS> Yup - I'm seeing exactly the same. DS>

Re: On the opening of sockets

2005-09-08 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 09:00:56PM +0200, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 02:27:13PM -0400, Robert Story wrote: > > On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 16:06:13 +0100 Dave wrote: > > DS> netsnmp_transport * > > DS> netsnmp_transport_open( char *string, int def_port ) > > > > I wo

Re: On the opening of sockets

2005-09-08 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 02:27:13PM -0400, Robert Story wrote: > On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 16:06:13 +0100 Dave wrote: > DS> netsnmp_transport * > DS> netsnmp_transport_open( char *string, int def_port ) > > I would have a third param, def_transport, which would be used if string > doesn't contain a t

Re: On the opening of sockets

2005-09-08 Thread Robert Story
On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 16:06:13 +0100 Dave wrote: DS> netsnmp_transport * DS> netsnmp_transport_open( char *string, int def_port ) I would have a third param, def_transport, which would be used if string doesn't contain a transport. -- NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the list

Re: On the opening of sockets

2005-09-08 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 02:52:35PM +0100, Dave Shield wrote: > On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 18:13 +0200, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 04:06:13PM +0100, Dave Shield wrote: > > > > What I'd envisage would be a call such as > > > > > > netsnmp_transport * > > > netsnmp_transport_

SNMP v3 Not Thread Safe even using Single Session API

2005-09-08 Thread John McCaskey
Hey, We've got a enterprise app with a net-snmp library based backend monitoring engine.  It's highly multi-threaded (ie about 100-200 worker threads doing snmp get/getnexts's at any given time.  I was under the impression from reading http://www.net-snmp.org/docs/README.thread.html that as long a

Re: On the opening of sockets

2005-09-08 Thread Dave Shield
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 18:13 +0200, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 04:06:13PM +0100, Dave Shield wrote: > > What I'd envisage would be a call such as > > > > netsnmp_transport * > > netsnmp_transport_open( char *string, int def_port ) > > > > which would take a transpor