RE: GETBULK and MFD Tables

2006-03-01 Thread Harold J. Ship
Ok - I got it to work. In 5.2.1, I had removed the init_snmp() call because we handle our own config file. By adding this back in, as init_snmp("") it works. I had noticed that a GET to the right community returned error, but the wrong community didn't return anything at all, so I investigated the

RE: GETBULK and MFD Tables

2006-03-01 Thread Dave Shield
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 15:08 +0200, Harold J. Ship wrote: > I'm trying to compile, link and run in 5.3.0.1 the code generated and > modified in 5.2.1 and I'm finding that nothing is happening: > Before I get too caught up in this, is this legal? The code was > generated in 5.2.1 using MFD; plus the

RE: GETBULK and MFD Tables

2006-03-01 Thread Harold J. Ship
I'm trying to compile, link and run in 5.3.0.1 the code generated and modified in 5.2.1 and I'm finding that nothing is happening: I receive "No more variables left in this MIB View" for any GET or GETNEXT. Before I get too caught up in this, is this legal? The code was generated in 5.2.1 using MF

Error building ASN.1 representation

2006-03-01 Thread venkayamma dudipally
Hi, I installed the net-snmp on FC4 for x86_64 with the following rpms dmidecode-2.6-1.14.x86_64.rpm, lm_sensors-2.8.8-5.x86_64.rpm net-snmp-libs-5.2.1.2-fc4.1.x86_64.rpm net-snmp-5.2.1-12.x86_64.rpm Once i installed the rpms i added my own module to the snmp agent by using the dlmod i.e i spec