Re: CFV: 5.5.1 release

2011-03-09 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 11:20:43 +, Dave Shield > said: DS> It doesn't really seem worth spinning another RC release DS> just for these two changes. How would people feel about DS> me going straight to the final 5.5.1 release? I think that's the right thing to do. It sounds stable.

RE: Notification Filtering

2011-03-09 Thread Shreyas Deodhar
Hey Dave, Is there any platform dependency here? Thanks, Shreyas From: dave.shi...@googlemail.com [dave.shi...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Dave Shield [d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk] Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 3:44 PM To: Shreyas Deodhar Cc: net-snmp-code

Re: Notification Filtering

2011-03-09 Thread Dave Shield
On 9 March 2011 15:44, Shreyas Deodhar wrote: > Is there any platform dependency here? There shouldn't be, no. The filtering is handled purely within the core agent code. There isn't any relevant O/S-specific code. All I can suggest is that you run the agent under a debugger, and single-step thr

Re: CFV: 5.5.1 release

2011-03-09 Thread Niels Baggesen
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 11:20:43AM +, Dave Shield wrote: >How would people feel about > me going straight to the final 5.5.1 release? +1 /Niels -- Niels Baggesen - @home - Århus - Denmark - n...@users.sourceforge.net The purpose of computing is insight, not numbers --- R W Hamming

Re: CFV: TZ offset handling

2011-03-09 Thread Niels Baggesen
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 11:20:36AM +, Dave Shield wrote: > Bug #3178389 has picked up on a silly error > in the handling of TZ offsets. +1 /Niels -- Niels Baggesen - @home - Århus - Denmark - n...@users.sourceforge.net The purpose of computing is insight, not numbers --- R W Hamming -

Re: net-snmp ipv6

2011-03-09 Thread Niels Baggesen
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 02:17:48PM -0800, Tarun Kumar wrote: > 2. Now when I run with > #snmpd udp6:161 -L -f -d -Dall This look very strange: > 2011-03-04 14:19:46 tdomain: tdomain_transport_full("snmp", " udp6:161", 1, > "[NIL]", "[NIL]") > 2011-03-04 14:19:46 trace: find_tdomain(): snmp_tr

Re: Support for ipNetToMediaTable.

2011-03-09 Thread Dave Shield
On 9 March 2011 12:49, Manjit wrote: > Please let me know which function in mib_module_init.h registers the mib of > ipNetToMedia table. Actually, I'm not sure. I've had a look at the code, and I can't spot anywhere that registers the OID of this table.So I'm not quite sure *why* this works!

Re: Support for ipNetToMediaTable.

2011-03-09 Thread Manjit
Hi Dave, Actually it is working as expected when i use snmpd daemon alone. But when i am integrating the code with my application it is answering for only one table( Running snmp as a thread ). Please let me know which function in mib_module_init.h registers the mib of ipNetToMedia table. This

Re: Support for ipNetToMediaTable.

2011-03-09 Thread Dave Shield
On 9 March 2011 09:08, Manjit wrote: > I am using net-snmp 5.4.2.1 . > For my system i need to support ipNetToMediaTable and ipNetToMedia table > both. > When i am doing a walk on these two tables i am only getting values for > ipNetToPhysicalTable. > > But ipNetToMediaTable returns nothing. I'v

Re: Support for ipNetToMediaTable.

2011-03-09 Thread Manjit
My system is working with 5.4.2.1 and we are using net-snmp as a thread on fedora. When i am doing a query on agent it is going to the below part of code : /* * Deal with unhandled results -> noSuchInstance (rather * than noSuchObject -- in that case, the type will

CFV: TZ offset handling

2011-03-09 Thread Dave Shield
Bug #3178389 has picked up on a silly error in the handling of TZ offsets. The header (on Linux at least) defines two ways of representing the offset between the local time, and UTC: extern long int timezone; /* Seconds west of UTC. */ and struct tm { long int tm_gmtof

CFV: 5.5.1 release

2011-03-09 Thread Dave Shield
The first public RC candidate (rc2) has been out for a week or so now. I haven't heard any reports of problems with this, or seen anything logged on the bug/patches tracker) (Apart from the timezone problem - see the separate CFV) There's only been one change to the 5.5.x code branch, being Jan's

Re: Support for ipNetToMediaTable.

2011-03-09 Thread Niels Baggesen
Den 09-03-2011 10:08, Manjit skrev: > I am using net-snmp 5.4.2.1 . > For my system i need to support ipNetToMediaTable and ipNetToMedia table > both. > When i am doing a walk on these two tables i am only getting values for > ipNetToPhysicalTable. > > But ipNetToMediaTable returns nothing. > [root

Support for ipNetToMediaTable.

2011-03-09 Thread Manjit
Hi, I am using net-snmp 5.4.2.1 . For my system i need to support ipNetToMediaTable and ipNetToMedia table both. When i am doing a walk on these two tables i am only getting values for ipNetToPhysicalTable. But ipNetToMediaTable returns nothing. [root@pactprov cli]# /opt/servers/netsnmp/bin/snm