Re: Two dynamic ports for sending traps

2011-03-27 Thread Daniel Ng
> But the same options were being used in an older version. I wasn't getting > duplicate traps with the same options used. > Has the behaviour changed with NET-SNMP version 5.4.2.1. Shouldn't it read > the config file once if it knows the user is provides it from the default > location? On v5.6, I

Re: SNMP v3 message doesn't follow ASN.1 constraints

2011-03-27 Thread Bart Van Assche
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Mikhail Kulinich wrote: > Consider the following dump as a Response to a Get Request: > > Received 125 bytes from UDP: [127.0.0.1]:161->[0.0.0.0] > : 30 7B 02 01 03 30 11 02 04 5B 70 9B 75 02 03 00 > 0{...0...[p.u... > 0016: FF E3 04 01 01 02 01 03 04 2E

SNMP v3 message doesn't follow ASN.1 constraints

2011-03-27 Thread Mikhail Kulinich
Hello, Consider the following dump as a Response to a Get Request: Received 125 bytes from UDP: [127.0.0.1]:161->[0.0.0.0] : 30 7B 02 01 03 30 11 02 04 5B 70 9B 75 02 03 000{...0...[p.u... 0016: FF E3 04 01 01 02 01 03 04 2E 30 2C 04 0D 80 00..0, 0032: 1F 88 80 82 0

Re: not installed via "make install"?

2011-03-27 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 10:02 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Magnus Fromreide > wrote: ... > The ABI effect. Should the symbols be present in the library > or not? > > Shouldn't be considered as part of the > ABI ? I think it should be installed to

Re: not installed via "make install"?

2011-03-27 Thread Bart Van Assche
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > On Sat, 2011-03-26 at 19:29 -0400, Bill Fenner wrote: > > On Mar 26, 2011, at 4:02 PM, Magnus Fromreide > wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 2011-03-26 at 14:08 -0400, Bill Fenner wrote: > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I tried a couple of recent svn check