> But the same options were being used in an older version. I wasn't getting
> duplicate traps with the same options used.
> Has the behaviour changed with NET-SNMP version 5.4.2.1. Shouldn't it read
> the config file once if it knows the user is provides it from the default
> location?
On v5.6, I
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Mikhail Kulinich wrote:
> Consider the following dump as a Response to a Get Request:
>
> Received 125 bytes from UDP: [127.0.0.1]:161->[0.0.0.0]
> : 30 7B 02 01 03 30 11 02 04 5B 70 9B 75 02 03 00
> 0{...0...[p.u...
> 0016: FF E3 04 01 01 02 01 03 04 2E
Hello,
Consider the following dump as a Response to a Get Request:
Received 125 bytes from UDP: [127.0.0.1]:161->[0.0.0.0]
: 30 7B 02 01 03 30 11 02 04 5B 70 9B 75 02 03 000{...0...[p.u...
0016: FF E3 04 01 01 02 01 03 04 2E 30 2C 04 0D 80 00..0,
0032: 1F 88 80 82 0
On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 10:02 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Magnus Fromreide
> wrote:
...
> The ABI effect. Should the symbols be present in the library
> or not?
>
> Shouldn't be considered as part of the
> ABI ? I think it should be installed to
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-03-26 at 19:29 -0400, Bill Fenner wrote:
> > On Mar 26, 2011, at 4:02 PM, Magnus Fromreide
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 2011-03-26 at 14:08 -0400, Bill Fenner wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I tried a couple of recent svn check