Re: 5.8 testing status

On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:00 PM, Bill Fenner wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:02 AM, Bart Van Assche > wrote: > >> On 04/26/18 04:57, Bill Fenner wrote: >> >>> A new feature went into 5.8 that conflicts a little with using an agentx >>> subagent. I

Re: 5.8 testing status

On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:02 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 04/26/18 04:57, Bill Fenner wrote: > >> A new feature went into 5.8 that conflicts a little with using an agentx >> subagent. I mentioned this here: >> https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/mailman/message/36270409/

Re: DISMAN PING MIB test case question

I do not think the DISMAN PING module builds anywhere but Linux. I am not a fan of the existing implementation since it is synchronous. (I have a from-scratch asynchronous rewrite sitting around languishing that I haven't tested anywhere but Linux; raw sockets are pretty notoriously incompatible

Re: DISMAN PING MIB test case question

On 04/26/18 11:01, Keith Mendoza wrote: I have a question about what permissions DISMAN PING MIB test case expects. I'm running on a macOS 12.3.4 with --enable-blumenthal-aes --with-openssl= --with-defaults. When I run make test as my normal user I get "skipped: Not permitted to create raw

DISMAN PING MIB test case question

I have a question about what permissions DISMAN PING MIB test case expects. I'm running on a macOS 12.3.4 with --enable-blumenthal-aes --with-openssl= --with-defaults. When I run make test as my normal user I get "skipped: Not permitted to create raw sockets". However, when I run make test

Re: 5.8 testing status

On 04/26/18 04:57, Bill Fenner wrote: A new feature went into 5.8 that conflicts a little with using an agentx subagent.  I mentioned this here: https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/mailman/message/36270409/ You can replicate it by configuring a normal snmpd as an agentx master, and then

Re: 5.8 testing status

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 5:14 PM, Keith Mendoza wrote: > Just want to see where everyone is regarding 5.8 release. Other than > what's listed in the 5.8pre2 announcement are there any other features that > will go into 5.8? > > Other that the bugs I filed last week from running

Re: [PATCH RFC] Add Travis and Appveyor CI support

Hi Bart, Also check out my travis config - configuring with different sets of configure args - minimalist is important to me, so it's nice to have regression testing against, and we had a couple of interesting bugs reported agaist --disable-set-support and --enable-read-only, so I added them.