Re: Alternative implementation of IF-MIB

2012-01-24 Thread Bhiku Mhatre
Thanks Michael, that did the trick. I was able to use the -I -ifTable option to disable the loading of the default ifTable and then I extended my perl embedded agent to register and handle the ifTable OID subtree along with my enterprise MIB tree. Worked like a charm. I still need to get the ifXTab

Re: Alternative implementation of IF-MIB

2012-01-23 Thread Michael Steiger
Please mail to the mailing list, not directly to me! On 24.01.2012 00:50 Carvaka Guru said the following: > Hi Michael, > Really sorry for contacting you directly but I was hoping that you could > point me in the right direction regarding a problem that I am having > with non-standard interfaces

Re: Alternative implementation of IF-MIB

2012-01-03 Thread Michael Steiger
On 03.01.2012 19:45 Robert Story said the following: > On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 14:58:03 +0100 Michael wrote: > MS> What I need is a framework where I add my 26 rows at init time and every > MS> GET request will lookup the values in the shared memory (which is > MS> continously updated from a differe

Re: Alternative implementation of IF-MIB

2012-01-03 Thread Robert Story
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 14:58:03 +0100 Michael wrote: MS> What I need is a framework where I add my 26 rows at init time and every MS> GET request will lookup the values in the shared memory (which is MS> continously updated from a different process). MS> MS> Is there such a framework available? Ye

Re: Alternative implementation of IF-MIB

2011-12-27 Thread Michael Steiger
On 30.11.2011 16:09 Robert Story said the following: > On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 10:55:30 +0200 Michael wrote: > MS> > The first question is whether or not you are completely replacing > MS> > the ifTable, or you just need to add your special interfaces to > MS> > the existing table... > MS> > MS>

Re: Alternative implementation of IF-MIB

2011-11-30 Thread Robert Story
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 10:55:30 +0200 Michael wrote: MS> > The first question is whether or not you are completely replacing MS> > the ifTable, or you just need to add your special interfaces to MS> > the existing table... MS> MS> My device has 26 ports (24x1G, 2x10G) + 1 management port (pretty usua

Re: Alternative implementation of IF-MIB

2011-10-28 Thread Michael Steiger
On 26.10.2011 00:03 Robert Story said the following: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Michael Steiger wrote: >> >> I need to implement IF-MIB for a network appliance (running embedded >> linux) where the ports are not integrated into linux but only accessible >> via special hardware. >> >> I alr

Re: Alternative implementation of IF-MIB

2011-10-25 Thread Robert Story
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Michael Steiger wrote: > > I need to implement IF-MIB for a network appliance (running embedded > linux) where the ports are not integrated into linux but only accessible > via special hardware. > > I already tried with MFD and also iterate or iterate-access but af