Passera Pablo-APP015 wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to bring this topic up again. Is there someone that
> has worked with this?. If not I think this is a bug, so I would like to
> submit it. Which is the mechanism for it?
Patches can be submitted to http://www.net-snmp.org/patches .
+Thomas
AM
To: Passera Pablo-APP015; Dave Shield; Magnus Fromreide
Cc: net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: Changing originator IP in trap/inform
Hi,
Someone has a comment on this? We changed that code line in our
implementation for proxying traps, and if you consider that this is a
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Passera Pablo-APP015
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 10:58 AM
To: Dave Shield; Magnus Fromreide
Cc: net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: Changing originator IP in trap/inform
Talking about RFC 3584 section 3.1 step 4, it states
append snmpEnterprise
varbind\n");
}
Regards,
Pablo
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Shield
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 6:00 AM
To: Magnus Fromreide
Cc: net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Changing originator IP in trap/
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 10:00:00AM +0100, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 01/08/06, Magnus Fromreide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In convert_v1pdu_to_v2:
> >
> > A community field is eventually inserted among the varbinds.
>
> That's correct.
> See RFC 3584, section 3.1, step 4.
>
> >
On 01/08/06, Magnus Fromreide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In convert_v1pdu_to_v2:
>
> A community field is eventually inserted among the varbinds.
That's correct.
See RFC 3584, section 3.1, step 4.
> It is also odd that it only happens in
> convert_v1pdu_to_v2.
Not really -
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 04:08:02PM +0100, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 19/07/06, Magnus Fromreide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >there is sadly a misalignment in the code so if you have the
> > functions that converts from v2-notification to v1-trap and back and calls
> > them like:
> >
> > res =
On 19/07/06, Magnus Fromreide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>there is sadly a misalignment in the code so if you have the
> functions that converts from v2-notification to v1-trap and back and calls
> them like:
>
> res = v2tov1(v1tov2(v2tov1(v1tov2(inputV1;
>
> then res != inputV1.
That
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 03:04:09PM +0100, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 19/07/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have notification originator application, which uses Net-SNMP APIs
> > and runs as a separate process (not part of snmpd).
>
> Presumably this runs as an AgentX
On 19/07/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have notification originator application, which uses Net-SNMP APIs
> and runs as a separate process (not part of snmpd).
Presumably this runs as an AgentX subagent - yes?
> Net-SNMP APIs assigns the local IP address as
10 matches
Mail list logo
