Re: [PATCH, RFC] Add Travis and Appveyor CI support

2018-05-17 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 10:57:08AM -0400, Bill Fenner wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 9:56 AM, Niels Baggesen via Net-snmp-coders < > net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > > Den 17-05-2018 kl. 15:54 skrev Robert Story: > > > >> On Wed, 16 May 2018 07:23:32 -0700 Bart wrote: > >> BVA>

Re: [PATCH, RFC] Add Travis and Appveyor CI support

2018-05-17 Thread Bill Fenner
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 9:56 AM, Niels Baggesen via Net-snmp-coders < net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Den 17-05-2018 kl. 15:54 skrev Robert Story: > >> On Wed, 16 May 2018 07:23:32 -0700 Bart wrote: >> BVA> This patch makes it possible to enable Travis and Appveyor >> BVA> continuo

Re: [PATCH, RFC] Add Travis and Appveyor CI support

2018-05-17 Thread Niels Baggesen via Net-snmp-coders
Den 17-05-2018 kl. 15:54 skrev Robert Story: On Wed, 16 May 2018 07:23:32 -0700 Bart wrote: BVA> This patch makes it possible to enable Travis and Appveyor BVA> continuous integration support. On Travis Net-SNMP is built BVA> with all MIBs, with --disable-set-support, with BVA> --enable-mini-agen

Re: [PATCH, RFC] Add Travis and Appveyor CI support

2018-05-17 Thread Robert Story
On Wed, 16 May 2018 07:23:32 -0700 Bart wrote: BVA> This patch makes it possible to enable Travis and Appveyor BVA> continuous integration support. On Travis Net-SNMP is built BVA> with all MIBs, with --disable-set-support, with BVA> --enable-mini-agent, with --enable-minimalist and with BVA> --ena

Re: [PATCH RFC] Add Travis and Appveyor CI support

2018-04-27 Thread Robert Story
On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:05:06 -0600 Bart wrote: BVA> On 04/25/18 11:54, Keith Mendoza wrote: BVA> > Out of curiosity, do you have a "fork" of Net-SNMP on github BVA> > to connect it to Travis and Appveyor? BVA> BVA> If you are looking for a Net-SNMP repository on github, please BVA> use https://g

Re: [PATCH RFC] Add Travis and Appveyor CI support

2018-04-26 Thread Bill Fenner
Hi Bart, Also check out my travis config - configuring with different sets of configure args - minimalist is important to me, so it's nice to have regression testing against, and we had a couple of interesting bugs reported agaist --disable-set-support and --enable-read-only, so I added them. Obv

Re: [PATCH RFC] Add Travis and Appveyor CI support

2018-04-25 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 04/25/18 12:58, Robert Story wrote: On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 09:06:28 -0600 Bart wrote: BVA> One of the advantages of github over SourceForge is that BVA> integration with continuous integration (CI) services like BVA> Travis and Appveyor is easy. Adding such support however BVA> requires to add pr

Re: [PATCH RFC] Add Travis and Appveyor CI support

2018-04-25 Thread Robert Story
On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 09:06:28 -0600 Bart wrote: BVA> One of the advantages of github over SourceForge is that BVA> integration with continuous integration (CI) services like BVA> Travis and Appveyor is easy. Adding such support however BVA> requires to add proper configuration files and the necessar

Re: [PATCH RFC] Add Travis and Appveyor CI support

2018-04-25 Thread Keith Mendoza
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, at 11:05 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 04/25/18 11:54, Keith Mendoza wrote: > > Out of curiosity, do you have a "fork" of Net-SNMP on github to connect it > > to Travis and Appveyor? > > Hello Keith, > > If you are looking for a Net-SNMP repository on github, please use

Re: [PATCH RFC] Add Travis and Appveyor CI support

2018-04-25 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 04/25/18 11:54, Keith Mendoza wrote: Out of curiosity, do you have a "fork" of Net-SNMP on github to connect it to Travis and Appveyor? Hello Keith, If you are looking for a Net-SNMP repository on github, please use https://github.com/net-snmp/net-snmp. I hope Wes will connect that repos

Re: [PATCH RFC] Add Travis and Appveyor CI support

2018-04-25 Thread Keith Mendoza
Bart, Out of curiosity, do you have a "fork" of Net-SNMP on github to connect it to Travis and Appveyor? On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, at 8:06 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > Hello, > > One of the advantages of github over SourceForge is that integration > with continuous integration (CI) services like Tr