On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Thomas Besemer
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Bill Fenner wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Thomas Besemer
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Bill Fenner wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Thomas Besem
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Bill Fenner wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Thomas Besemer
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Bill Fenner wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Thomas Besemer <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
I am working with ne
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Thomas Besemer
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Bill Fenner wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Thomas Besemer > > wrote:
>>
>>> I am working with net-snmp 5.7.3, and will be using several Sub-Agents
>>> in my project, with fairly large amount
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Bill Fenner wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Thomas Besemer
> wrote:
>
>> I am working with net-snmp 5.7.3, and will be using several Sub-Agents in
>> my project, with fairly large amounts of data. I have noted that issuing a
>> 'snmpbulkwalk' to Master
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Thomas Besemer
wrote:
> I am working with net-snmp 5.7.3, and will be using several Sub-Agents in
> my project, with fairly large amounts of data. I have noted that issuing a
> 'snmpbulkwalk' to Master Agent results in this broken down into GETNEXT
> requests to
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Getbulk maximum message size
>>>>> "RS" == Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DBGA> However, it seems that when the msgMaxSize of the originator is
DBGA> exceeded, Net-SNMP agent doesn't respond at all
RS> Ee
> "RS" == Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DBGA> However, it seems that when the msgMaxSize of the originator is
DBGA> exceeded, Net-SNMP agent doesn't respond at all
RS> Eeek. That's not good. Please file a bug report.
Unfortunately, I believe the fix is not easy at all. It'll requi
Blanco Gabriel-AGD019 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2007 11:18:47 PM
Subject: Re: Getbulk maximum message size
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 11:24:06 -0400 Del wrote:
DBGA> I am using Net-SNMP 5.3.0.1, and I am having problems with the size
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 11:24:06 -0400 Del wrote:
DBGA> I am using Net-SNMP 5.3.0.1, and I am having problems with the size of
the packets returned by getbulk.
DBGA> [...]
DBGA> However, it seems that when the msgMaxSize of the originator is exceeded,
Net-SNMP agent doesn't respond at all
Eeek. Tha
On 10/04/07, Senthil Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have used mib2c in iterate config for code generation.
> Is it possible, can i identify the Get bulk request before translate into
> conscutive Get requests.
If you're using the iterator helper, then no.
This particular helper does not
[ First - *please* don't mail me privately, without copying
any responses to the mailing list. I don't have the time
or inclination to offer private, unpaid, SNMP consultancy.
Keep discussions to the list, where others can both learn
and offer advice. Thanks. ]
On 05/04
[ First - *please* don't mail me privately, without copying
any responses to the mailing list. I don't have the time
or inclination to offer private, unpaid, SNMP consultancy.
Keep discussions to the list, where others can both learn
and offer advice. Thanks. ]
On 04/09
On 04/09/06, Ritwik, Basu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could you please tell me the function prototype for getbulk???
At what level are you working? (Which language? :-))
What function prototypes are you comparing GETBULK against?
The basic Net-SNMP library uses the same functions to send *all*
Ok - I got it to work. In 5.2.1, I had removed the init_snmp() call
because we handle our own config file. By adding this back in, as
init_snmp("") it works. I had noticed that a GET to the right community
returned error, but the wrong community didn't return anything at all,
so I investigated the
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 15:08 +0200, Harold J. Ship wrote:
> I'm trying to compile, link and run in 5.3.0.1 the code generated and
> modified in 5.2.1 and I'm finding that nothing is happening:
> Before I get too caught up in this, is this legal? The code was
> generated in 5.2.1 using MFD; plus the
I'm trying to compile, link and run in 5.3.0.1 the code generated and
modified in 5.2.1 and I'm finding that nothing is happening: I receive
"No more variables left in this MIB View" for any GET or GETNEXT.
Before I get too caught up in this, is this legal? The code was
generated in 5.2.1 using MF
> On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 14:56:05 +0200, "Harold J. Ship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Harold> I've just tried a small example using 5.3.0.1 and GET-BULK with MFD
Harold> appears to be ok.
Harold> In order to port our agent over, it will take a few days of
Harold> effort. We may or may not de
I've just tried a small example using 5.3.0.1 and GET-BULK with MFD
appears to be ok.
In order to port our agent over, it will take a few days of effort. We
may or may not depending upon a number of factors.
Harold Ship
Giant Steps Networks
--
On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 14:39 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Will this problem affect other MIB2C template implementations
> like mib2c.iterate.conf?
It shouldn't do, no. I believe that the fixes Robert is
referring to are specifically concerned with MfD code.
They shouldn't affect the iterator
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
Story
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 11:03 AM
To: Harold J. Ship
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: GETBULK and MFD Tables
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:03:28 +0200 Harold wrote:
HJS> You are right, we are using 5.2.1. I'd
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:03:28 +0200 Harold wrote:
HJS> You are right, we are using 5.2.1. I'd like to avoid having to convert
HJS> all of our agent to 5.3 if I can.
Ok. What about 5.2.2? That's a smaller step (though I'm not 100% sure it will
fix the problem).
HJS> I tried the change you suggested
You are right, we are using 5.2.1. I'd like to avoid having to convert
all of our agent to 5.3 if I can.
I tried the change you suggested, changing ASN_PRIV_RETRY to
SNMP_NOSUCHINSTANCE in the _mfd_xTable_get_values() function both in the
current table and the following table, but that didn't help
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 09:32:33 +0200 Harold wrote:
HJS> I have a problem with GETBULK on an agent developed using mib2c with
HJS> MFD.
You didn't say which release, but I'm guessing 5.2.x, right? If you can, jump
up to 5.3.0.1. There have been lots of improvements to the generated code in
5.3. If yo
23 matches
Mail list logo
