Re: Net-SNMP 5.10.pre1 released for testing

On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 at 10:50, Wes Hardaker via Net-snmp-coders < net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > only be used for bug fixes at this point. Please give 5.10.pre1 a > whirl -- it certainly won't be perfect yet. > I've built 5.10~pre1 using the Debian package setup, was a few patches

Re: Net-SNMP 5.10.pre1 released for testing

On 3/14/25 3:06 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: The above patch has been split and has been submitted as a pull request to the ntopng project. See also https://github.com/ntop/ntopng/pull/9028#issuecomment-2718468627. This pull request has been merged. Bart. __

Re: Net-SNMP 5.10.pre1 released for testing

On 3/10/25 4:27 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: gnugk: snmp.cxx:87:11: error: expected '(' for function-style cast or type construction trapOID[ OID_LENGTH(trapOID) - 1 ] = trapNumber; ^~~ /usr/local/include/net-snmp/library/asn1.h:65:56: note: expanded fro

Re: Net-SNMP 5.10.pre1 released for testing

On 3/10/25 5:48 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: diff --git a/include/SNMPSession.h b/include/SNMPSession.h index 932b3d96ce17..e12ef0a2f893 100644 --- a/include/SNMPSession.h +++ b/include/SNMPSession.h @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@  class SNMPSession {   public:    struct snmp_session session; -  void *sessio

Re: Net-SNMP 5.10.pre1 released for testing

On 3/10/25 4:27 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: To see how things are going with API changes, I've tested building everything in OpenBSD ports which depends on this. (I'm not suggesting that Net-SNMP needs to change anything unless these are unexpected, but at least giving other package maintainers a

Re: Net-SNMP 5.10.pre1 released for testing

On 3/10/25 4:27 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: ntopng: various from snmp_sess_* functions taking struct session_list * rather than void *, and also src/SNMP.cpp:452:47: error: assigning to 'oid *' (aka 'unsigned long *') from incompatible type 'const oid[10]' (aka 'const unsigned long[10]')

Re: Net-SNMP 5.10.pre1 released for testing

On 2025/03/07 15:34, Wes Hardaker via Net-snmp-coders wrote: > > Greetings all, > > It's been a while --- time to finally release a 5.10 pre-release > candidate. Consider this a feature freeze and the master branch should > only be used for bug fixes at this point. Please give 5.10.pre1 a > wh

Re: Net-SNMP 5.9.4.rc1 available for final testing

Alexander Bergmann writes: > Hi Craig, > > Thanks for the reply. Any update on your search for the GPG signing > key? Sorry fro the delay. I just put a new file in: https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp-admin%20PGP%20key/current-key/ Specifically, the net-snmp-admins-2023-

Re: Net-SNMP 5.9.4.rc1 available for final testing

Hi Craig, Thanks for the reply. Any update on your search for the GPG signing key? I know that this is a minor problem, but we try to keep the code signature validation in place as good as we can. Thanks, Alex~ On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 07:20:56PM +1000, Craig Small wrote: > I asked the same thi

Re: Net-SNMP 5.9.4.rc1 available for final testing

I asked the same thing a few weeks ago. Wes said he put the key on the mit servers. I haven't checked that (or rc1 either). Both are on my to-do list. - Craig On Wed, 12 July 2023, 19:12 Alexander Bergmann via Net-snmp-coders, < net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Hi Wes / everyon

Re: Net-SNMP 5.9.4.rc1 available for final testing

Hi Wes / everyone, Where can I find the current GPG signing key that was used to sign the latest updates? gpg: assuming signed data in 'net-snmp-5.9.4.rc1.tar.gz' gpg: Signature made Thu 22 Jun 2023 05:15:02 PM CEST gpg:using EDDSA key 6E6718AEF1EB5C65C32D1B2A356BC0B552D53CAB gpg:

Re: Net-SNMP 5.9.3 published

Craig Small writes: > Debian net-snmp packages 5.9.3-1 have also been built and uploaded. Nice, thanks. -- Wes Hardaker Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net ___ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourcefor

Re: Net-SNMP 5.9.3 published

On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 at 07:42, Wes Hardaker via Net-snmp-coders < net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > So a 5.9.3 release has now been pushed to: > Debian net-snmp packages 5.9.3-1 have also been built and uploaded. No major issues, I'm hoping to reduce some of the patches I'm carrying

Re: Net-SNMP 5.9.2 published

On 7/5/22 11:01, Wes Hardaker wrote: However, the 5.9 branch and the main branch have a *lot* of conflicts to resolve. The process of always merging patches to main frequently to avoid this has fallen away, and the branches are now fairly divergent which is going to be a problem to solve first -

Re: Net-SNMP 5.9.2 published

Bart Van Assche writes: > +1 for releasing the next version from the master branch. That would > make Net-SNMP easier to maintain since it would reduce the number of > branches to maintain from two to one. Agreed, though typically we'd fork after that point with a patches branch. We should pro

Re: Net-SNMP 5.9.2 published

On 6/30/22 19:23, Wes Hardaker via Net-snmp-coders wrote: I'm thinking we should look toward a main-branch release next (5.10). Opinions welcome. +1 for releasing the next version from the master branch. That would make Net-SNMP easier to maintain since it would reduce the number of branches

Re: net-snmp and openssl v3

Craig Small writes: > However, net-snmp v 5.9.1 doesn't have all of these yet. I can either > try to pick the relevant ones out and patch the Debian package, or > wait until 5.9.2 comes out. My question is, is there an idea when that > would be?  My preference is to not patch as I'll be cherry-pi

Re: Net-SNMP 5.9.2.pre1 published for testing

Craig Small writes: > Anyway, the change was to add $(AGENTLIB) to the linker line for > libnetsnmptrapd in apps/Makefile.in When I looked in the apps/Makefile.in it looked to me that it already had that in it -- can you provide an exact patch? Maybe I misread where you meant to apply it. -- W

Re: Net-SNMP 5.9.2.pre1 published for testing

Hello again, The issue was tied up with libtool and how Debian's is slightly different. link_all_deplibs is set to no so you explicitly need to put the libraries. Anyway, the change was to add $(AGENTLIB) to the linker line for libnetsnmptrapd in apps/Makefile.in The result is I can Debian packa

Re: Net-SNMP 5.9.2.pre1 published for testing

On Thu, 7 Apr 2022 at 07:11, Craig Small wrote: > I'll run the source code through a standard Debian pbuilder and one with > OpenSSL v3 added as well to check it works with both versions. > Standard Debian sid pbuilder came up with this error below. convert_v1pdu_to_v2() and send_v2trap() are in

Re: Net-SNMP 5.9.2.pre1 published for testing

Craig Small writes: > On Wed, 6 Apr 2022, 10:09 Wes Hardaker via Net-snmp-coders, > > wrote: > > Net-SNMP 5.9.2.pre1 has been published for testing as available at: > > I can confirm that the compile issues with OpenSSL v3 are fixed with this. > > I'll run the source code through a stand

Re: Net-SNMP 5.9.2.pre1 published for testing

On Wed, 6 Apr 2022, 10:09 Wes Hardaker via Net-snmp-coders, < net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > Net-SNMP 5.9.2.pre1 has been published for testing as available at: > I can confirm that the compile issues with OpenSSL v3 are fixed with this. I'll run the source code through a stan

Re: net-snmp and openssl v3

(+Wes) On 3/21/22 23:08, Craig Small wrote: I received a bug report about issues linking net-snmp with openssl v3. Generally its because there are functions referenced that were deprecated in 3.0 or even sometimes 1.1.0 ! I started looking around and found that net-snmp already has some, if

Re: net-snmp and openssl v3

On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 at 07:41, Craig Small wrote: > Hi, > I received a bug report about issues linking net-snmp with openssl v3. > Generally its because there are functions referenced that were deprecated > in 3.0 or even sometimes 1.1.0 ! > > I started looking around and found that net-snmp alr

Re: NET-SNMP 5.7.3: Got signal 6 in netsnmp_tdomain_transport_full operation

Hi Olivier, As RHEL maintainer of net-snmp, I can only advise you to check whether you're using the up to date version of net-snmp in RHEL-7 (net-snmp-5.7.2-49.1). I was able to find some modifications in netsnmp_tdomain_transport_full method, that was backported from the upstream commit https://

Re: Net-snmp encryptions

"Srilatha Devineni (sdevinen) via Net-snmp-coders" writes: > I installed 5.9.1 net-snmp and I see there is no support for AES AES requires OpenSSL to be installed when Net-SNMP is compiled. Use the --with-openssl flag to point to the path where it is installed if it couldn't find it in a defaul

Re: Net-SNMP AgentX - Problem with new MIB and snmpset

Hi, I have not received yet any reply. Please, may you keep in consideration my request? I am registered on SourgeForce site, is there any action I have to take? Thank you BR Simone Il giorno gio 22 apr 2021 alle ore 13:14 Simone Moni ha scritto: > Hi all, > I'm a newbie with AgentX. I need to

RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re: net-snmp-5.5.0-2.x64.exe Questions

: [Non-DoD Source] Re: net-snmp-5.5.0-2.x64.exe Questions Hello Josh, I am only the Debian packager of net-snmp not the "owner" of the software. In fact it would be difficult to get one voice on the "owner" as there are many including several organisations. So, this is co

Re: net-snmp-5.5.0-2.x64.exe Questions

Hi Josh, I'm the original founder of the Net-SNMP project, but I'm not a lawyer. Craig pretty much nailed the analysis perfectly in my opinion: > net-snmp is licensed with multiple different types of licenses, as seen in the > COPYING file[1].  The licenses can be broken down into several types:

Re: net-snmp-5.5.0-2.x64.exe Questions

Hello Josh, I am only the Debian packager of net-snmp not the "owner" of the software. In fact it would be difficult to get one voice on the "owner" as there are many including several organisations. So, this is coming from a non-US citizen who hasn't written a line of net-snmp but has written ot

RE: net-snmp-5.5.0-2.x64.exe Questions

Good afternoon, I am following up on the below email. Has your organization had time to review the below questions? Thank you. Regards, Josh Oezer PMA-290 P-8 EWSP Deputy Team Lead PMA-290 P-8 Acting MCDS Team Lead PMA-290 P-8 MCDS Lead Engineer SIPR:

Re: Net-SNMP 5.8 compatibility issue

The incompatibility started when I upgraded OpenSSL. Since I am compiling NET-SNMP within yocto, I cannot do 'make install'. On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:18 AM Wes Hardaker < harda...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Simon Chamlian writes: > > > There seems to be a compatibility issue between ne

Re: Net-SNMP 5.8 compatibility issue

Simon Chamlian writes: > There seems to be a compatibility issue between net-snmp and the crypto > library. Was that a self-built Net-SNMP 5.8? And it was built recently after the system upgraded to the newer libcrypto? And did you try a 'make install' to see if the installation works or is th

Re: Net-SNMP 5.9 release announcement

Craig Small writes: > Even though the signature checks out, the archive seems to be > corrupted. Odd. Turns out that "star", which is the verison of tar we decided decades ago was the only one that produced tar archives that worked on every platform we could find, messes up when overwriting

Re: Net-SNMP 5.9 release announcement

Hi, Even though the signature checks out, the archive seems to be corrupted. $ tar tfz ~/Downloads/net-snmp-5.9.tar.gz >/dev/null gzip: stdin: decompression OK, trailing garbage ignored tar: Child returned status 2 tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now - Craig _

Re: Net-SNMP 5.9 release announcement

On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 at 20:11, Craig Small wrote: > gzip: stdin: decompression OK, trailing garbage ignored > tar: Child returned status 2 > tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now I don't even know how vi does this, but: net-snmp-5.9/ci/perl.bat net-snmp-5.9/ci/build.sh gzip: /home/csmall/Dow

Re: net-snmp 5.9 released (early announcement)

Andy Fiddaman writes: > Just FYI, the archive contains some .o files. > This causes problems when building on a different architecture or 32-bit. Archives fixed; thanks for pointing out the issue. -- Wes Hardaker Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net ___

Re: net-snmp 5.9 released (early announcement)

Andy Fiddaman writes: > Just FYI, the archive contains some .o files. > This causes problems when building on a different architecture or 32-bit. Argg Thanks. -- Wes Hardaker Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net ___

Re: net-snmp 5.9 released (early announcement)

Just FYI, the archive contains some .o files. This causes problems when building on a different architecture or 32-bit. Andy ___ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-

Re: Net-SNMP 5.8 core dump

On 2020-05-26 10:49, David Moriconi (dmoricon) via Net-snmp-coders wrote: > The Net-SNMP daemon crashed with the following error (full backtrace can > be found below): > > Error in `/usr/local/netsnmp/netsnmp_base/sbin/snmpd': malloc(): > smallbin double linked list corrupted: 0x56546e6a9840 >

Re: net-snmp-5.8.1.pre2 released

On 2020-02-26 04:04, Wes Hardaker wrote: > Bart Van Assche writes: >> One change seems to be missing from this list, namely commit >> 9a2753282c6a ("new autoconf"). That commit regenerated the configure >> script with autoconf v2.69. Has it been considered to also switch to >> newer versions of au

Re: net-snmp-5.8.1.pre2 released

Bart Van Assche writes: > One change seems to be missing from this list, namely commit > 9a2753282c6a ("new autoconf"). That commit regenerated the configure > script with autoconf v2.69. Has it been considered to also switch to > newer versions of automake (v1.11 -> v1.16) and libtool (v2.4 -> >

Re: net-snmp-5.8.1.pre2 released

On 2020-02-20 14:58, Wes Hardaker via Net-snmp-coders wrote: > > After far far too long of a delay, I've just pushed net-snmp-5.8.1.pre2 > to the download site: > > https://www.net-snmp.org/download.html > > Please give it a whirl, and report issues and fixes to our github site > at: > >

Re: Net-snmp 5.7.3

On 2020-01-30 21:17, Philippe DENIS via Net-snmp-coders wrote: > Hello, > > When building my sub agent in the same way than the sub-agent example, I got > some errors during the compilation; > u_char, u_long, u_short error unknown types. > > Have you experienced this issue ? > The Linux version

Re: Net-snmp 5.7.3 - Issue to communicate with subAgent and Master Agent

On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 12:49:33AM +0100, Philippe Denis wrote: > > > Le 3 f??vr. 2020 ?? 00:41, Philippe Denis a ??crit : > > > > ???Hello, > > > > I???ve succeeded to connect the sub-agent and the master agent by using the > > /var/agents/master in the c code and also in conf. Files. > > >

Re: Net-snmp 5.7.3 - Issue to communicate with subAgent and Master Agent

Hi, Even If you’re not an expert as you wrote previously, this keyword is not present on the google or in some examples present in the net-snmp tutorial. Then, it’s quite hard to find ... Thanks a lot, now it’s working. I put the MIB OID terminated by .0 and everything dialogs correctly. Cordia

Re: Net-snmp 5.7.3 - Issue to communicate with subAgent and Master Agent

I am no expert, but I also run snmpd and a custom sub agent configuration. Your sub agent should be registering with the master what OIDs it will handle: One line for each MIB. REGISTER_SYSOR_TABLE(companyx_oid, companyx_oid_len, "Top level MIB for Company products"); REGISTER_SYSOR_TABLE(

Re: Net-snmp 5.7.3 - Issue to communicate with subAgent and Master Agent

Hello all, I've performed some actions to fix my problem(s) but I'm not sure the situation is the one that I though; it's. I though the Agentx and master agent are connected based on the following behaviour: - I've started the Master agent followed by the Agentx, I got a connection message.

Re: Net-snmp 5.7.3 - Issue to communicate with subAgent and Master Agent

> Le 3 févr. 2020 à 00:41, Philippe Denis a écrit : > > Hello, > > I’ve succeeded to connect the sub-agent and the master agent by using the > /var/agents/master in the c code and also in conf. Files. > > Both are exchanging request but no value is received from local host or > through remo

Re: Net-snmp 5.7.3 - Issue to communicate with subAgent and Master Agent

On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 02:13:59PM +0100, Philippe Denis wrote: > Hello all, > > I've a problem to communicate with my subAgent through the Master Agent. > I've used the option -Dnetsnmp_udpbase and the message is correctly > received at master Agent level (of course, the one which send from remot

Re: NET-SNMP Installation Question_

On 2020-01-14 10:28, Peck, Ian A wrote: For the NET-SNMP installation is there any prerequisite SW that needs to be installed? For instance do I need visual studio installed before I try to install and use

Re: NET-SNMP-5.8

On 2019-12-30 02:39, Seyfullah BECERİKLİ wrote: > We have some issues installing net-snmp-5.8 version. Do you have any > specific installation guide for it? Hi Seyfullah, How about installing v5.8.1.pre1 instead of v5.8? A large number of bugs has been fixed in v5.8.1.pre1. That version is availa

Re: Net-SNMP crash when AgentX SubAgent times out

Thank you for the clarification. From: Anders Wallin Date: Monday, December 2, 2019 at 12:18 PM To: "David Moriconi (dmoricon)" Cc: "net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net" Subject: Re: Net-SNMP crash when AgentX SubAgent times out Hi David, I'm just a user o

Re: Net-SNMP crash when AgentX SubAgent times out

a Net-snmp-coders" < > net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net> > *Reply-To: *"David Moriconi (dmoricon)" > *Date: *Thursday, November 28, 2019 at 8:27 AM > *To: *Anders Wallin > *Cc: *"net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net" < > net-snmp-coders@lists.

Re: Net-SNMP crash when AgentX SubAgent times out

-snmp-coders" Reply-To: "David Moriconi (dmoricon)" Date: Thursday, November 28, 2019 at 8:27 AM To: Anders Wallin Cc: "net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net" Subject: Re: Net-SNMP crash when AgentX SubAgent times out Hi Anders, Thank you for your response Do you k

Re: Net-SNMP crash when AgentX SubAgent times out

Hi Anders, Thank you for your response Do you know if a newer version will be released soon with the fix? David From: Anders Wallin Date: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 at 4:40 PM To: "David Moriconi (dmoricon)" Cc: "net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net" Subject: Re:

Re: Net-SNMP crash when AgentX SubAgent times out

Hi David, yes there are a few patches that fixes this issue, I suggest the you use the latest code from g...@github.com:net-snmp/net-snmp.git Regards Anders Wallin On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 10:17 PM David Moriconi (dmoricon) via Net-snmp-coders wrote: > Hi, > > I am using Net-SNMP version 5.8 o

Re: [Net-Snmp] Build Snmp lib in Android

On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 07:47:38AM +, Tran Quang Linh (FGA.PDC) via Net-snmp-coders wrote: > Dear Net-Snmp developer team, > > Currently, I'm trying to build your project > (https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/code/ci/master/tree/) in Android to build > it in 64 bit architecture. But when I

Re: Net-snmp version that supports HMAC-SHA-224 and greater

"Adolf Misquith (amisquit) via Net-snmp-coders" writes: > What version of snmp supports greater HMAC-SHA-256 and greater? 5.8 :-) > Further, a new user is added with the following step: > > createUser testUser SHA "test123" AES > > Is there a possibility to configure HMAC-SHA-224/256/384/512

Re: net-SNMP on windows getting decryption error

On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 7:30 PM Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 10/23/18 6:00 AM, Mark Christiansen wrote: > > Does anybody have ideas of what could be going wrong here? > > > > I built net-SNMP 5.8 for my Windows 10 machine. I set up my snmpd.conf > > file as shown below where I added the same users

Re: net-SNMP on windows getting decryption error

On 10/23/18 6:00 AM, Mark Christiansen wrote: Does anybody have ideas of what could be going wrong here? I built net-SNMP 5.8 for my Windows 10 machine. I set up my snmpd.conf file as shown below where I added the same users as I have on my Linux machine called aurelius. I get the following re

Re: net-SNMP on windows getting decryption error

It would be really nice to get an answer to my question that I posted last Tuesday. I've compiled net-snmp for windows configured to use openSSL. My version 3 access to my remote server aurelius works but it doesn't work with my local server. What have I done wrong in building net-snmp for windows

Re: Net-SNMP 5.8 - Having both snmp v2 and v3 available.

I got it working. Since I was compiling under Yocto, the cache wasn't cleared. Thanks, S On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 11:17 AM, Wes Hardaker < harda...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Simon Chamlian writes: > > > I am not seeing and compilation errors. It compiles fine but v2 does > > not work: >

Re: Net-SNMP 5.8 - Having both snmp v2 and v3 available.

Simon Chamlian writes: > I am not seeing and compilation errors. It compiles fine but v2 does > not work: Very odd. What options did you compile with (IE, configure options... run ./config.status --version to find out, or 'net-snmp-config --configure-options'. You might also run snmpd with -D

Re: Net-SNMP 5.8 - Having both snmp v2 and v3 available.

I am not seeing and compilation errors. It compiles fine but v2 does not work: *with 5.7.3* $ snmpset -v 3 -u Simon -a MD5 -A Simon-00 -l authNoPriv 172.27.43.15 MPBC-1RU-MIB::mpbc1RUAckTrapCriticalEnable.0 i 1 MPBC-1RU-MIB::mpbc1RUAckTrapCriticalEnable.0 = INTEGER: true(1) $ snmpget -v 2c -c pu

Re: Net-SNMP 5.8 - Having both snmp v2 and v3 available.

Simon Chamlian writes: > With snmp 5.7.3 I used to have the agent handling both v2 and v3. > > With 5.8, only v3 seems to be available. No, they should both work. Can you be more specific about how you compiled it and what errors you're seeing? -- Wes Hardaker Please mail all replies to net-s

Re: Net-snmp 5.7.3 Yocto - [No Such Object available on this agent at this OID]

Simon Chamlian writes: > I have been working several days on this issue without any success. Other sections of the mib tree work? Have you run with -DALL too read the debugging output to see what's happnening? Have you walked the nsModuleTable to see if your OID is properly registered with the

Re: Net-snmp 5.7.3 Yocto - [No Such Object available on this agent at this OID]

Simon Chamlian writes: > Did anyone used net-snmp under systemd ? Lots of linux distros package systemd config with their net-snmp packages, so definitely "yes". -- Wes Hardaker Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net ---

Re: Net-snmp 5.7.3 Yocto - [No Such Object available on this agent at this OID]

Did anyone used net-snmp under systemd ? On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Simon Chamlian wrote: > Hi, > > I have been working several days on this issue without any success. > > On our old Linux embedded system (using LTIB - Linux target Integrated > Builder), the agent was working fine. Now I

Re: Net-SNMP 5.8.rc4 available for testing

On 07/02/18 06:46, Robert Story wrote: > On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 13:38:27 -0700 Bart wrote: > BVA> Can you explain why you have ignored all nine patches that I > BVA> posted one week ago? Had you noticed that one of these patches > BVA> is a build fix? See also > BVA> https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp

Re: Net-SNMP 5.8.rc4 available for testing

On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 13:38:27 -0700 Bart wrote: BVA> Can you explain why you have ignored all nine patches that I BVA> posted one week ago? Had you noticed that one of these patches BVA> is a build fix? See also BVA> https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/mailman/message/36349380/. I did not ignore the

Re: Net-SNMP 5.8.rc4 available for testing

On 06/28/18 16:06, Robert Story wrote: Net-SNMP 5.8.rc4 is now available for testing at https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.8-release-candidates/ Below is a summary of the change in 5.8.rc4. Please see the CHANGES file for a more detailed list of specific bugs/patch

Re: net-snmp 5.8: "unknown snmp version 193" from agentx subagent

Oops, it turns out that the reason that it works is because the agentx session is in the session list that is always iterated over, so, this fix is wrong: we should just silently ignore agentx sessions in this code. -- Chec

Re: net-snmp 5.8: "unknown snmp version 193" from agentx subagent

On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 10:58 AM Bill Fenner wrote: > The new code in net-snmp 5.8 that tries to account for v1 or v2 trap > sessions logs an error from an agentx subagent, since the agentx code > registers the session as being AGENTX_VERSION_1. This constant is only > defined in the agentx code

Re: Net-SNMP 5.8.rc3 available for testing

Robert Story writes: > With any luck, this will be the last release candidate Yes please! Thanks for all your work getting this out the door Robert. I'd like to ask everyone (me too) to really really decide if a patch you're proposing is truly a show stopper. I'd also suggest that we plan on a

Re: Net-SNMP 5.8.rc2 available for testing

On 2018/05/19 10:26, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 08:46:40PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > On 05/18/18 18:05, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > On 2018/05/18 18:36, Robert Story wrote: > > > > snmplib: > > > >- [BUG 2815]: Display UTF-8 characters again > > > >

Re: Net-SNMP 5.8.rc2 available for testing

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 08:46:40PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 05/18/18 18:05, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2018/05/18 18:36, Robert Story wrote: > > > snmplib: > > >- [BUG 2815]: Display UTF-8 characters again > > >- [BUG 3444939]: BUG: 1796886: snmplib: Avoid that >

Re: Net-SNMP 5.8.rc2 available for testing

On 05/18/18 18:05, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2018/05/18 18:36, Robert Story wrote: snmplib: - [BUG 2815]: Display UTF-8 characters again - [BUG 3444939]: BUG: 1796886: snmplib: Avoid that sprint_realloc_octet_string() embeds unprintable control characters or

Re: Net-SNMP 5.8.rc2 available for testing

On 2018/05/18 18:36, Robert Story wrote: > snmplib: > - [BUG 2815]: Display UTF-8 characters again > - [BUG 3444939]: BUG: 1796886: snmplib: Avoid that > sprint_realloc_octet_string() embeds unprintable control characters > or binary zeroes in its output. This behavi

Re: Net-SNMP is moving to GitHub -- Your input appreciated

On Fri, May 11, 2018, at 1:59 AM, Josef Ridky wrote: > Hi, > > here are my 0.02$ > > | > | We have decided to move our Net-SNMP development to GitHub after many > | wonderful years being hosted at SourceForge. We greatly appreciate > | SourceForge's support of open source projects over the ye

Re: Net-SNMP is moving to GitHub -- Your input appreciated

Josef Ridky writes: Thanks so much for your opinions! |> Is it possible to keep the mailing list still available (don't have to |> be at SF, but have somewhere a mailing list)? |> It is useful for general discussion and I think it is better than forums. Well, as my badly written options didn't

Re: Net-SNMP is moving to GitHub -- Your input appreciated

Stuart Henderson writes: |> One thing to note with this that's not immediately obvious with github |> downloads, the automatically added "source code" links in github releases |> are generated on-the-fly then cached, so they're subject to change if |> they update software on nodes if the files ex

Re: Net-SNMP is moving to GitHub -- Your input appreciated

On 2018/05/10 16:14, Wes Hardaker via Net-snmp-coders wrote: > 6. downloads > > Github uses a different mechanism for distributing tarballs of > downloads. But I don't see an issue with this in the future. One thing to note with this that's not immediately obvious with github downloa

Re: Net-SNMP is moving to GitHub -- Your input appreciated

Hi, here are my 0.02$ | | We have decided to move our Net-SNMP development to GitHub after many | wonderful years being hosted at SourceForge. We greatly appreciate | SourceForge's support of open source projects over the years, but it's | time we take advantage of some features of GitHub that

Re: Net-SNMP 5.8.pre3 available

On Fri, 4 May 2018 05:16:29 -0700 Bart wrote: BVA> Thanks for having drawn our attention to that bug report. How BVA> about fixing bug 2831 with the below patch? BVA> [...] BVA> include/net-snmp/agent/agent_internal_vars.h | 25 BVA> [...] BVA> +#include In order to make it clear that this hea

Re: Net-SNMP 5.8.pre3 available

On 2018/05/04 05:16, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 05/03/18 13:48, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2018-04-27, Robert Story wrote: > > > We're closing in on a final release. The current plan is to have > > > release candidate 1 next week. > > > > Is it planned to address https://sourceforge.net/p/ne

Re: Net-SNMP 5.8.pre3 available

On 05/03/18 13:48, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2018-04-27, Robert Story wrote: We're closing in on a final release. The current plan is to have release candidate 1 next week. Is it planned to address https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/bugs/2831/ before release or are distro packagers going to

Re: Net-SNMP 5.8.pre3 available

On Thu, 3 May 2018 21:48:50 +0100 Stuart wrote: SH> On 2018-04-27, Robert Story wrote: SH> > We're closing in on a final release. The current plan is to SH> > have release candidate 1 next week. SH> SH> Is it planned to address SH> https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/bugs/2831/ before release or

Re: Net-SNMP 5.8.pre3 available

On 2018-04-27, Robert Story wrote: > We're closing in on a final release. The current plan is to have > release candidate 1 next week. Is it planned to address https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/bugs/2831/ before release or are distro packagers going to need to patch the other programs to cope?

Re: Net-SNMP v5.8 and Darwin

Bart, On Mon, Apr 23, 2018, at 6:45 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 04/23/18 00:34, Keith Mendoza wrote: > > Even with the -std=c89 flag the issue is still present. I was able to > > replicate the issue with the following code: > > > > === BEGIN C CODE === > > #include > > #define OPENSSL_NO_SH

Re: Net-SNMP v5.8 and Darwin

On 04/23/18 00:34, Keith Mendoza wrote: Even with the -std=c89 flag the issue is still present. I was able to replicate the issue with the following code: === BEGIN C CODE === #include #define OPENSSL_NO_SHA512 #include const EVP_MD *getType() { const EVP_MD *ret; ret = (const EVP_

Re: Net-SNMP v5.8 and Darwin

Bart, On Sun, Apr 22, 2018, at 4:59 PM, Keith Mendoza wrote: > Bart, > I was hoping to discuss with you on IRC; but, you're not online. > > On Sun, Apr 22, 2018, at 4:10 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > On 04/22/18 08:35, Keith Mendoza wrote: > > > Bart, > > > I was actually working on this yester

Re: Net-SNMP v5.8 and Darwin

Bart, I was hoping to discuss with you on IRC; but, you're not online. On Sun, Apr 22, 2018, at 4:10 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 04/22/18 08:35, Keith Mendoza wrote: > > Bart, > > I was actually working on this yesterday. This is what I know so far after > > a few hours of digging into this:

Re: Net-SNMP v5.8 and Darwin

On 04/22/18 08:35, Keith Mendoza wrote: Bart, I was actually working on this yesterday. This is what I know so far after a few hours of digging into this: It appears that there's an issue with getting to the memory address that EVP_sha512() returns when it's called in sc_get_openssl_hashfn().

Re: Net-SNMP v5.8 and Darwin

Bart, I was actually working on this yesterday. This is what I know so far after a few hours of digging into this: It appears that there's an issue with getting to the memory address that EVP_sha512() returns when it's called in sc_get_openssl_hashfn(). Why this is so, I don't know. Below are de

Re: Net-SNMP 5.8.pre2 available

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 3:11 PM, Robert Story wrote: > A pre-release version of the next major Net-SNMP release is now > available for testing. Net-SNMP 5.8.pre3 can be downloaded from: > This announcement had a typo. Release 5.8.pre2 (not pre3) is available. Robert -

Re: NET-SNMP version: 5.7.3 and IPv6

I don't have any other suggestions here, other than trying a rebuild from scratch to make sure you have a self-consistent tree. I'm not familiar with cross compiling. rocommunity6 works for me when I specify it in my natively-compiled agent. Bill On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 9:29 AM, Simon Chamlian

Re: NET-SNMP version: 5.7.3 and IPv6

SNMP Versions Supported:1 2c 3 Building for: linux Net-SNMP Version: 5.7.3 Network transport support: Callback Unix Alias TCPIPv6 UDPIPv6 UDP TCP IPv6Base SocketBase TCPBase UDPBase UDPIPv4Base IPv4Base SNMPv3 Security Modules: usm *** MIB Module warning

Re: NET-SNMP version: 5.7.3 and IPv6

Can you paste the end of your configuration run, where it summarizes the results? The “rocommunity6” configuration directive will be available if that configuration summary includes “UDPIPv6” in the “Network transport support:” list - e.g., -

Re: NET-SNMP version: 5.7.3 and IPv6

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:58:40AM -0500, Simon Chamlian wrote: > but these tokens are not recognized: > ./snmpd.conf: line 12: Warning: Unknown token: rocommunity6. > ./snmpd.conf: line 13: Warning: Unknown token: rwcommunity6. This means that snmpd did not understand you config, and acco

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >