It is resolved by adding ''--with-openssl' .
-
Net-SNMP configuration summary:
-
SNMP Versions Supported:1 2c 3
Building for: linux
Net-SNMP Version
Hi All,
It is resolved by adding ''--without-openssl' .
-
Net-SNMP configuration summary:
-
SNMP Versions Supported:1 2c 3
Building for: linux
Net-
; [email protected]
Subject: Re: Support for heterogeneous trap types
If an object contain 1 byte string, it will be BIT STRING.
if an object contains more than 1 and less than 65535 bytes, OCTET STRING
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Madhusudhana R
mailto:madhusudhan
Fenner [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Monday, June 05, 2017 9:54 PM
> *To:* Madhusudhana R
> *Cc:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: Support for heterogeneous trap types
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Madhusudhana R
> wrote:
>
[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2017 9:54 PM
To: Madhusudhana R
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Support for heterogeneous trap types
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Madhusudhana R
mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Coders,
My query is, does net-snmp s
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Madhusudhana R
wrote:
> Hi Coders,
>
>
>
> My query is, does net-snmp support heterogeneous trap types?
>
> More precisely, is it possible to send traps with different data types
> like integer signed/unsigned/32bit/64bit , strings etc. during same
> execution
>
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:22:09 + Gerasimos wrote:
GK> I have a question on snmp encryption.As far as I understand AES
GK> ciphers stronger than 128bits are not supported by NetSnmp. How
GK> about hash SHA2? Does NetSnmp support hash SHA256?If yes, on
GK> which version and how could I set it when
Hi Sarath,
In out project we use net-snmp version 5.0.9, this is also EOL by net-snmp,
still there is no problem using SnmpV3,
--
Anish
From: sarath azad
To: "[email protected]"
Sent: Friday, 9 August 2013 10:28 AM
Subject: Support fo
On 9 March 2011 12:49, Manjit wrote:
> Please let me know which function in mib_module_init.h registers the mib of
> ipNetToMedia table.
Actually, I'm not sure.
I've had a look at the code, and I can't spot anywhere that registers the OID
of this table.So I'm not quite sure *why* this works!
Hi Dave,
Actually it is working as expected when i use snmpd daemon alone.
But when i am integrating the code with my application it is answering
for only one table( Running snmp as a thread ).
Please let me know which function in mib_module_init.h registers the mib
of ipNetToMedia table.
This
On 9 March 2011 09:08, Manjit wrote:
> I am using net-snmp 5.4.2.1 .
> For my system i need to support ipNetToMediaTable and ipNetToMedia table
> both.
> When i am doing a walk on these two tables i am only getting values for
> ipNetToPhysicalTable.
>
> But ipNetToMediaTable returns nothing.
I'v
My system is working with 5.4.2.1 and we are using net-snmp as a thread
on fedora.
When i am doing a query on agent it is going to the below part of code :
/*
* Deal with unhandled results -> noSuchInstance (rather
* than noSuchObject -- in that case, the type will
Den 09-03-2011 10:08, Manjit skrev:
> I am using net-snmp 5.4.2.1 .
> For my system i need to support ipNetToMediaTable and ipNetToMedia table
> both.
> When i am doing a walk on these two tables i am only getting values for
> ipNetToPhysicalTable.
>
> But ipNetToMediaTable returns nothing.
> [root
> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 09:43:07 +0800, ÀèÃ÷ said:
f> how can the net-snmp support ipv6 when the compile. thanks
./configure --enable-ipv6
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:45:59 -0700, Anders Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Anders> Most of the changes are Solaris specific, however, a small number of
Anders> changes were made to the generic and Linux specific code. I have
Anders> uploaded a patch (#1524755) for the generic/Linux
Most of the changes are Solaris specific, however, a small number of
changes were made to the generic and Linux specific code. I have
uploaded a patch (#1524755) for the generic/Linux changes.
Anders
Rao Shoaib wrote:
> Thanks Wes. Anders will upload the fixes. my understanding is that
> thes
Thanks Wes. Anders will upload the fixes. my understanding is that these
are only Solaris specific changes. Anders is looking into how to make
sure that these changes are applied only if they are being built on the
latest solaris release which has support for these. What is the normal
practice
> On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 15:42:31 -0700, Rao Shoaib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Rao> Yes I am talking about 4022/4113. How do we contribute these changes so
Rao> that they are included as part of the distribution. Anders from our team
Rao> has made the changes and will provide them to you once yo
Subhendu Ghosh wrote:
>
> UDP/TCP - Are you taking about 4022/4113 ? We are looking at this for
> Linux. Might be useful to add the linux bits if the framework exists.
> Can you upload the patch?
>
Yes I am talking about 4022/4113. How do we contribute these changes so
that they are included
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Rao Shoaib wrote:
> Thomas Anders wrote:
>
>> Ganesh Hiregoudar wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Could you please let us know about the complete support of RFC 4293
in
>>> net-snmp 5.3.0.1 or 5.3.1 ?
>>>
>> See README.agent-mibs that ships with the source.
>>
> I currently have access to 5.3
Thomas Anders wrote:
>Ganesh Hiregoudar wrote:
>
>
>>Could you please let us know about the complete support of RFC 4293 in
>>net-snmp 5.3.0.1 or 5.3.1 ?
>>
>>
>
>See README.agent-mibs that ships with the source.
>
>
I currently have access to 5.3.1.pre1 and it seems that there is partial
Rao Shoaib wrote:
> I currently have access to 5.3.1.pre1 and it seems that there is partial
> support. Does 5.3.1 have full support ?
No. Same status as 5.3.1.pre1.
>> While we're at it: we're still desperately looking for volunteers to
>> port the IF-MIB rewrite to Solaris. The framework is alr
Ganesh Hiregoudar wrote:
> Could you please let us know about the complete support of RFC 4293 in
> net-snmp 5.3.0.1 or 5.3.1 ?
See README.agent-mibs that ships with the source.
While we're at it: we're still desperately looking for volunteers to
port the IF-MIB rewrite to Solaris. The framework
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 03:12:34AM -0700, mahua dutta wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> As it is installed as a package with the OS
> installation. It is difficult to disturb the same .
> is there any other way ?
No. As the agent your OS provides is built without SMUX support you have to
build an agent with smu
Hi Dave,
As it is installed as a package with the OS
installation. It is difficult to disturb the same .
is there any other way ?
As I replied in another mail
snmpd -H >
Output does not show any keyword smux.
I am confused whether it is supposrted in this
particular version.
Thanks & regards
No It does not not give .
There is no smux related staff in snmpd -H .
Does it mean it is not supported ?
--- Magnus Fromreide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 08:38:07PM -0700, mahua
> dutta wrote:
> > Hi ,
> > I like to enable SMUX for NET-SNMP version 5.0.9
> on
> > solaris
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 20:38 -0700, mahua dutta wrote:
> Is smux not supported in NET-SNMP version 5.0.9 ?
> If it is supported how can I enable?
configure --with-mib-modules=smux
make
sudo make install
Dave
---
This SF.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 08:38:07PM -0700, mahua dutta wrote:
> Hi ,
> I like to enable SMUX for NET-SNMP version 5.0.9 on
> solaris 5.10. I have added
> smuxpeer 1.3.6.1.4.100 passwrd in
> /etc/sma/snmp/snmpd.conf file.
>
> But while running the snmpd it gives the following
> warning.
> /etc/sma/s
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 22:36, Srini Kode (skode) wrote:
> Our requirement needs the net-snmp-5.1 to support udp & tcp
> for both ipv4 and ipv6.
> Accordingly I used the options udp:161 and tcp:161 [and]
> added 2 more options: udp6:161 and tcp6:161.
> The snmp daemon does not come up.
I seem to r
c: Dave Shield; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Support for tcp with IPv6
>
> >>>>> On Fri, 27 May 2005 10:06:58 -0700, "Srini Kode
> (skode)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Srini> Thanks for the quick response.
> Srini>
> > On Fri, 27 May 2005 10:06:58 -0700, "Srini Kode
> (skode)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Srini> Thanks for the quick response.
> Srini> Is tcp supported for IPv6 also in net-snmp-5.1.
> Srini> If yes, what are the options I need to pass while starting the
> Srini> snmp
>
> use, tcp6:161
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 20:01, Srini Kode (skode) wrote:
> Does net-snmp-5.1 support snmp requests using tcp.
Yes
> If yes, what are the options I need to pass while starting
> the snmp daemon.
Add "tcp:161" to the command used to start the agent.
Dave
-
> On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 10:33:17 +0530, Sanjib Nath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Sanjib> Does netsnmp support for multicasting? I have a multicast
Sanjib> address and I want to make snmpd listen to that address
Sanjib> against snmpget request at that multicast address i.e. snmpget
Sanjib> .
Nope
33 matches
Mail list logo
