On 12/02/2013 12:53 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 11:24 +0800, yzhu1 wrote:
>> On 11/26/2013 02:58 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 11:05 +0800, yzhu1 wrote:
Hi, Magnus
Follow your advice, I made the 3 new patches. Now the patches are in the
Hi
Any update?
Zhu Yanjun
On 12/04/2013 04:48 PM, yzhu1 wrote:
> On 12/02/2013 12:53 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
>> On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 11:24 +0800, yzhu1 wrote:
>>> On 11/26/2013 02:58 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 11:05 +0800, yzhu1 wrote:
> Hi, Magnus
>
>
Hi, maintainers
Any update about these patches?
Zhu Yanjun
On 12/04/2013 04:48 PM, yzhu1 wrote:
> On 12/02/2013 12:53 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
>> On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 11:24 +0800, yzhu1 wrote:
>>> On 11/26/2013 02:58 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 11:05 +0800, yzhu1 w
Hi, maintainers
Any update about these patches?
Zhu Yanjun
On 12/04/2013 04:48 PM, yzhu1 wrote:
> On 12/02/2013 12:53 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
>> On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 11:24 +0800, yzhu1 wrote:
>>> On 11/26/2013 02:58 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 11:05 +0800, yzhu1 w
On 12/02/2013 12:53 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 11:24 +0800, yzhu1 wrote:
>> On 11/26/2013 02:58 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 11:05 +0800, yzhu1 wrote:
Hi, Magnus
Follow your advice, I made the 3 new patches. Now the patches are in the
On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 11:24 +0800, yzhu1 wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 02:58 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 11:05 +0800, yzhu1 wrote:
> >> Hi, Magnus
> >>
> >> Follow your advice, I made the 3 new patches. Now the patches are in the
> >> attachment. Please check them.
> >> Thanks a
Hi, Magnus
In agent/mibgroup/target/snmpTargetAddrEntry.c:832
if (temp_struct->params == NULL)
...
*var_len = temp_struct->paramsLen;
Since params may have NUL, it is not appropriate to use params to get
the length of string.
Now I made a new patch in the attachment. Please check it.
Thanks
Hi, Magnus
In some log, I replace nameData with the hex string of nameData.
Maybe the log file can look better.
The patch is in the attachment. Please check it.
Best Regards!
Zhu Yanjun
On 11/28/2013 02:55 PM, zhuyj wrote:
On 11/26/2013 02:52 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 1
On 11/26/2013 02:52 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 19:04 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
On 11/25/2013 02:34 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 14:27 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
4.patch -p1 < V5-7-patches-snmpTargetParam_support_zero_OID.patch
snmpTargetAddrEntry.c:
Chunk #2 is
On 11/26/2013 02:52 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 19:04 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
>> On 11/25/2013 02:34 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 14:27 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
4.patch -p1 < V5-7-patches-snmpTargetParam_support_zero_OID.patch
>>> snmpTargetAddrEntry.c:
On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 11:05 +0800, yzhu1 wrote:
>
> Hi, Magnus
>
> Follow your advice, I made the 3 new patches. Now the patches are in the
> attachment. Please check them.
> Thanks a lot.
Are that really the new patches?
It seems all the issues I spoke about are still present.
/MF
-
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 19:04 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
> On 11/25/2013 02:34 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 14:27 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
> > >
> > > 4.patch -p1 < V5-7-patches-snmpTargetParam_support_zero_OID.patch
> > snmpTargetAddrEntry.c:
> > Chunk #2 is unnecessary - setting membe
On 11/25/2013 02:34 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 14:27 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
On 11/22/2013 10:54 AM, zhuyj wrote:
On 11/22/2013 02:45 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 10/16/13 10:31, zhuyj wrote:
If this patch is used in net-snmp-5.7.2, the following should be used,
too. If no
On 11/23/2013 09:03 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 11/22/13 07:27, zhuyj wrote:
>> I prepared 3 patches based on V5-7-branch.
> In the Net-SNMP project backwards compatibility is considered very
> important. I think the patch "V5-7-patches-conf-support.patch" changes
> snmpd_parse_config_targetAdd
On Fri, 2013-11-22 at 14:27 +0800, zhuyj wrote:
> On 11/22/2013 10:54 AM, zhuyj wrote:
> > On 11/22/2013 02:45 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >> On 10/16/13 10:31, zhuyj wrote:
> >>> If this patch is used in net-snmp-5.7.2, the following should be used,
> >>> too. If not, snmp-trap could not work wel
On 11/22/13 07:27, zhuyj wrote:
> I prepared 3 patches based on V5-7-branch.
In the Net-SNMP project backwards compatibility is considered very
important. I think the patch "V5-7-patches-conf-support.patch" changes
snmpd_parse_config_targetAddr() such that the target address entry in
the config fi
On 11/22/2013 10:54 AM, zhuyj wrote:
On 11/22/2013 02:45 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 10/16/13 10:31, zhuyj wrote:
If this patch is used in net-snmp-5.7.2, the following should be used,
too. If not, snmp-trap could not work well.
Hello Zhu,
Please make yourself familiar with git and start fr
On 11/22/2013 02:45 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 10/16/13 10:31, zhuyj wrote:
>> If this patch is used in net-snmp-5.7.2, the following should be used,
>> too. If not, snmp-trap could not work well.
> Hello Zhu,
>
> Please make yourself familiar with git and start from the V5-7-patches
> or mast
On 11/21/2013 10:41 PM, zhuyj wrote:
On 11/18/2013 07:08 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 11/18/13 11:48, zhuyj wrote:
On 09/10/2013 01:41 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 09/10/13 04:04, zhuyj wrote:
Please help me to merge this patch into trunk. Thanks a lot.
Hello Zhu,
The code in snmpd_parse_
On 11/18/2013 07:08 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 11/18/13 11:48, zhuyj wrote:
On 09/10/2013 01:41 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 09/10/13 04:04, zhuyj wrote:
Please help me to merge this patch into trunk. Thanks a lot.
Hello Zhu,
The code in snmpd_parse_config_targetAddr() and
store_snmpTarg
On 10/16/13 10:31, zhuyj wrote:
> If this patch is used in net-snmp-5.7.2, the following should be used,
> too. If not, snmp-trap could not work well.
Hello Zhu,
Please make yourself familiar with git and start from the V5-7-patches
or master branch when preparing patches. The patch that was atta
On 11/18/13 11:48, zhuyj wrote:
> On 09/10/2013 01:41 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 09/10/13 04:04, zhuyj wrote:
>>> Please help me to merge this patch into trunk. Thanks a lot.
>>
>> Hello Zhu,
>>
>> The code in snmpd_parse_config_targetAddr() and
>> store_snmpTargetAddrEntry() assumes that tar
On 09/10/2013 01:41 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 09/10/13 04:04, zhuyj wrote:
>> Please help me to merge this patch into trunk. Thanks a lot.
>
> Hello Zhu,
>
> The code in snmpd_parse_config_targetAddr() and
> store_snmpTargetAddrEntry() assumes that targetAddTable_struct.params
> is an ASCII
On 08/19/2013 12:58 PM, zhuyj wrote:
Hi,
I run the following commands:
--snmpset -c NETMAN -v 2c 128.224.162.243
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetParamsRowStatus.0.25 i 5
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetParamsRowStatus.'..' = INTEGER:
createAndWait(5)
--snmpget -c NETMAN -v 2c 128.224.162.243
SNMP-TA
On 09/10/13 04:04, zhuyj wrote:
> Please help me to merge this patch into trunk. Thanks a lot.
Hello Zhu,
The code in snmpd_parse_config_targetAddr() and
store_snmpTargetAddrEntry() assumes that targetAddTable_struct.params is
an ASCII string that does *not* contain an ASCII '\0' nor any ASCII
Hi, Magnus
Please help me to merge this patch into trunk. Thanks a lot.
Best Regards!
Zhu Yanjun
On 08/19/2013 12:58 PM, zhuyj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I run the following commands:
>
> --snmpset -c NETMAN -v 2c 128.224.162.243
> SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetParamsRowStatus.0.25 i 5
> SNMP-TARGET-MIB::sn
Hi,
Any update?
Best Regards!
zhuyj
On 08/20/2013 10:23 AM, zhuyj wrote:
> Hi, maintainers
>
> Would you like to comment on this patch? Thanks a lot.
>
> Best Regards!
> zhuyj
> On 08/19/2013 03:30 PM, zhuyj wrote:
>> Hi, maintainers
>>
>> This patch is similar with snmpTargetAddr patch. Would y
Hi, maintainers
Would you like to comment on this patch? Thanks a lot.
Best Regards!
zhuyj
On 08/19/2013 03:30 PM, zhuyj wrote:
> Hi, maintainers
>
> This patch is similar with snmpTargetAddr patch. Would you like to
> merge this patch into trunk?
>
> Best Regards!
> zhuyj
> On 08/19/2013 12:58
Hi, maintainers
This patch is similar with snmpTargetAddr patch. Would you like to merge
this patch into trunk?
Best Regards!
zhuyj
On 08/19/2013 12:58 PM, zhuyj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I run the following commands:
>
> --snmpset -c NETMAN -v 2c 128.224.162.243
> SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetParamsRowSt
Hi,
I run the following commands:
--snmpset -c NETMAN -v 2c 128.224.162.243
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetParamsRowStatus.0.25 i 5
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetParamsRowStatus.'..' = INTEGER: createAndWait(5)
--snmpget -c NETMAN -v 2c 128.224.162.243
SNMP-TARGET-MIB::snmpTargetParamsRowStatus.0.2
30 matches
Mail list logo
