Hello, is there any option how to configure snmptrapd to accept only
specific version of SNMP traps (v2c) regardless informations sent by SNMP
device in SNMP trap header?
Thanks.
Tomas
--
Open Source Business Conference (O
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Tanisha Kashyap <
tanisha.kash...@aricent.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I want to send a trap to the NMS which contains just a text information
> indicating that a certain event is about to begin.
>
> Do I need a MIB variable for this or is there a way to send text
>
What about the SNMPv1
"If you think you can, or you think you can't...You are Right" -- Henry Ford
From: Pranesh Kulkarni [mailto:pranes...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 2:25 PM
To: Tanisha Kashyap
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re
Instead of NOTIFICATION-TYPE use TRAP-TYPE
For more info ,
checkout this
http://www.net-snmp.org/tutorial/tutorial-5/commands/snmptrap.html
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Tanisha Kashyap wrote:
> What about the SNMPv1
>
>
>
> "If you think you can, or you think you can't...You are Right"
Thanks.
"If you think you can, or you think you can't...You are Right" -- Henry Ford
From: Pranesh Kulkarni [mailto:pranes...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 2:30 PM
To: Tanisha Kashyap
Cc: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Trap
Inst
2009/3/3 Mike Ayers :
> Cloning the user does not clone the VACM settings.
> The user "wes" has no authorization to read or write anything.
But kusama said that he had the line
rwuser wes
in the snmpd.conf file.
Which should allow access once the user is created.
Dave
-
2009/3/4 malar vizhi :
> C:\>snmpwalk -d -v 1 -c public 192.168.1.172 UCD-SNMP-MIB:ucdavis
>
> Sending 40 bytes to UDP: [0.0.0.0]->[192.168.1.172]:161
> : 30 26 02 01 00 04 06 70 75 62 6C 69 63 A1 19 02 0&.public¡..
> 0016: 02 21 D9 02 01 00 02 01 00 30 0D 30 0B 06 07 2B .!U
2009/3/4 Tomáš Harabin :
> Hello, is there any option how to configure snmptrapd to accept only
> specific version of SNMP traps (v2c) regardless informations sent by SNMP
> device in SNMP trap header?
You should be able to use the "group" token (see snmpd.conf(5)) to
specify the acceptable SNMPv2
2009/3/4 Pranesh Kulkarni :
>> What about the SNMPv1
> Instead of NOTIFICATION-TYPE use TRAP-TYPE
No!
If you are writing your MIB using SMIv2, then you *always* use
NOTIFICATION-TYPE.
This MIB definition can then be used with SNMPv1 traps, SNMPv2c traps/informs,
and SNMPv3 traps/informs
You
Thanks for answer, but I have this problem:
My SNMP device is sending traps, which have SNMPv3 version information in
SNMP trap header. But it is not fully SNMPv3 trap, it has only that
structure. My vendor argue with argument, that snmptrapd should be
configured to receive traps as a SNMPv2c regar
Hi Mike,
you said,
Cloning the user does not clone the VACM settings. The user "wes" has no authorization to read or write anything.
I think what u said is correct bcoz i can see in the usmUser table the
entries for my user "wes" but not in vacm tables.
Check out the `snmpvacm` command.
S
Hello, is there any option how to configure snmptrapd to accept only
specific version of SNMP traps (v2c) regardless informations sent by SNMP
device in SNMP trap header?
Thanks.
Tomas
--
Open Source Business Conference (O
[ First - *please* don't mail me privately, without copying
any responses to the mailing list. I don't have the time
or inclination to offer private, unpaid, SNMP consultancy.
Keep discussions to the list, where others can both learn
and offer advice. Thanks. ]
2009/3/4
2009/3/4 Tomáš Harabin :
> My SNMP device is sending traps, which have SNMPv3 version information in
> SNMP trap header. But it is not fully SNMPv3 trap, it has only that
> structure.
What do you mean by "it only has that structure"?
The difference between SNMPv2 requests and SNMPv3 requests
is e
I know that SNMPv2c and SNMPv3 difference and my device is sending trap with
header inforamtions: version=3, msgMaxSize=0 (this is bad information and
stop processing), My device doesnt support SNMPv3 (encryption, etc). My
device's vendor thinks that this bad header should be ingnored and analy
Hi Dave,
This is my result If I execute walk on system group
C:\>snmpwalk -v 1 -c public 192.168.1.172 system
RFC1213-MIB::sysDescr.0 = STRING: "Hardware: x86 Family 15 Model 6 Stepping
5 AT/AT COMPATIBLE - Software: Windows 2000 Version 5.0 (Build 2195
Multiprocessor Free)"
RFC1213-MIB::sy
2009/3/4 malar vizhi :
> My sysObjectID is "OID: MSSQLSERVER-MIB::software.1.3.1.2"
OK - so you are not running the Net-SNMP agent on this system.
In which case it won't include Net-SNMP specific information
(such as the ucdavis tree).
> Am trying to get details from ucdavis tree for three machi
2009/3/4 Tomáš Harabin :
> I know that SNMPv2c and SNMPv3 difference and my device is sending trap with
> header inforamtions: version=3, msgMaxSize=0 (this is bad information and
> stop processing), My device doesnt support SNMPv3 (encryption, etc).
If your device doesn't support SNMPv3, then
Hi,
I have installed net-snmp-5.2.5.1.tar.gz package on my Linux RHEL 4 system.
I have made one change in the SNMPv2-MIB.txt file. I added one element in
the .iso.org.dod.internet.mgmt.mib-2.system node. In the local system I am
able to see the node through snmptranslate command but when I use any
This seems to be a compiler issue. I had another 11.11 system that had the
ANSIC compiler loaded. This compiled and ran correctly the 1st time. I tried
using the GCC 4.3.1 version of compiler on the box with an issue, and it is
nothing but headaches.
Paul R. Hogan
Computer System Engineer
Thank U So Much Dave.Now I got the reason..Y my machine is not
supporting ucdavis
Ok...U mean My linux machine is runnnig net-snmp...Ya U r correctBcoz if
I get a snmpd version am getting "ucd-snmp 4.2.4"..
But Then I coudnt get any ucdavis tree related info...
C:\>snmpwalk -v 1 -c p
2009/3/4 malar vizhi :
> But Then I coudnt get any ucdavis tree related info...
> Y Dave?...
Access Control.
Read the FAQ
Dave
--
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackl
We're adding support for a new object that will be represented in a
table. Right now the priority is to get the trap support working, and IF
we have time in the schedule we'll also add support for the MIB table.
Here's an abbreviated layout of the new table:
vmTable OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { pvt3Sy
2009/3/4 McGowen, Wendy :
> Do I have to include the index
> value in the OID for the vmName object in the trap
I believe so, yes.
>From RFC 2578:
8.1. Mapping of the OBJECTS clause
The OBJECTS clause, which need not be present, defines an ordered
sequence of MIB obje
Hello,
I'm trying to compile a net-snmp agent with authentication and cipher support.
I've compiled the openssl for my target and gave the directory to the
"--with-openssl=dir".
Here's an example:
Make openssl ---> ...openssl/include/openssl/*.h
---> ...openssl/lib/*.a
Config
Hello,
I'm trying to compile a net-snmp agent with authentication and cipher support.
I've compiled the openssl for my target and gave the directory to the
"--with-openssl=dir".
Here's an example:
Make openssl ---> ...openssl/include/openssl/*.h
---> ...openssl/lib/*.a
Configu
> From: kusuma.bm [mailto:kusuma...@globaledgesoft.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:50 AM
> snmpvacm -v 3 -u wes -l authNoPriv -a MD5 -A initialpasswd
> 172.16.8.145:161 createSec2Group 3 wes-network wesRWGroup
> Error in packet.
> Reason: authorizationError (access denied to that object
Ahh, I hadn't thought of using the vmName as the index (I'm too used to
thinking about indices as "integers"). That would work beautifully,
because that name is guaranteed to be unique (in the scope of the table,
at least), and is constant with respect to the object itself.
So in that case I would
2009/3/4 McGowen, Wendy :
> I haven't done anything with string indices
> yet, but it looks like I just have to convert each character in the
> string to its ASCII equivalent (for example, "vm1" would be .118.109.49,
> correct?).
Perhaps.
It depends on whether the index is IMPLIED or not.
29 matches
Mail list logo