Hi Wayne,
I did a build of 5.4.2.1 with the following options:
$ ./net-snmp-config --configure-options
'--enable-ipv6' '--with-out-mib-modules=mibII/ipv6'
'--enable-mfd-rewrites'
But I've not been able to reproduce the issue that you are
seeing. However, I've been doing my testing on
Hi Matt,
Could you provide me with the patch level that your machine is running?
Cheers,
Anders
Matt Matson wrote:
Thomas,
Thank you for the confirmation. In that case, do you have any input as
to the errors I'm receiving on the 5.4.1 compile (see previous post URL
and corrections
e1000g0:2: flags=1000843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4 mtu 1500 index 2
inet 192.168.100.210 netmask ff00 broadcast 192.168.100.255
Have the output of ./snmpd -D access:interface:container:arch -D
kernel_sunos5
attached.
On Tuesday 11 December 2007, Anders Persson
Hi Joe,
I just tested net-snmp 5.4.1 on a sun4u system running Solaris 9 and it
worked for me (I used --with-mib-modules=if-mib
--enable-mfd-rewrites). Could you run the agent with '-D
access:interface' and email me whatever the output is?
Thanks,
Anders
Joe Gainey wrote:
I've seen one
Hi Mike,
After you run configure, open agent/mibgroup/mib_module_includes.h and
move the line #include mibgroup/kernel_sunos5.h to the top. Then run make.
PS. You also need to include the line #define
NETSNMP_INCLUDE_IFTABLE_REWRITES in include/net-snmp/system/solaris.h
to get the new tables
Thomas Anders wrote:
Mike Brodbelt wrote:
I'm using the net-snmp shipped by Sun as part of Solaris 10. I'd like to
monitor interface traffic on Gig-E interfaces, but can't get any output
from the ifXTable. Is ifXTable currently supported at all by net-snmp,
and is it supported on Solaris?
Thomas Anders wrote:
Anders Persson wrote:
There is ongoing work to rewrite the Solaris bits to use the new framework.
This is excellent news. Any estimate on when it may be finished? We're
planning to start the 5.4 release cycle in September. Wouldn't be too
bad to ship 5.4
Ah! I totally missed that :-/ I guess I was expecting the same behavior
as tcpConnEntry, where the indices are accessible.
Thanks for making it obvious.
Anders
Thomas Anders wrote:
Anders Persson wrote:
#define UDPENDPOINTTABLE_MIN_COL COLUMN_UDPENDPOINTPROCESS
#define
Hi all,
I was looking at udpEndpointTable in 5.3.0.1, and I noticed that the
only column from the table that is being displayed is
udpEndpointProcess. Does anyone know why not all columns are being
extracted?
Thanks,
Anders
---
Using
Thomas Anders wrote:
On what platform?
Well, this behavior appears to me to be platform independent, because in
udpEndpointTable_constants.h the min and max columns are set as follows:
#define UDPENDPOINTTABLE_MIN_COL COLUMN_UDPENDPOINTPROCESS
#define UDPENDPOINTTABLE_MAX_COL
10 matches
Mail list logo