On Friday 11 August 2006 10:58, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 11/08/06, David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I found some code (from 2003) which did this from Avantcom. I have
> > talked to the original author and he has not done anything much with it
> > and it
On Friday 11 August 2006 10:10, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 10/08/06, David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there a corresponding value for wireless cards that does reflect the
> > current speed (an 802.11b card can for instance operate at 11, 5, 2 and 1
> > Mb/
The ifSpeed is I understand meant to be the rated speed of an interface,
not the minute to minute actual speed. In the case of Ethernet interfaces
obviously the two are normally the same and the speed does not change
other than congestion.
Is there a corresponding value for wireless cards that
I am trying to map a network dynamically using snmp, and I would like not
to have to try each possible IP address, but rather only use those that
we know have communicated with each box and therefore appear in the list
that ip neigh produces. But I can not find an snmp table which contains
this i
I am getting an assert error reported when using OpenNMS to poll a machine
running net-snmp. It reads:-
netsnmp_assert index == tmp failed if-mib/data_access/interface_common.c:407
_access_interface_entry_save_name( )
Is this a configuration error or a bug?
I am running on Debian unstabl
I can see how to configure snmpd (Linux sid) to send V2c traps TO a specific
machine, but I can not see how to specify which interface (or ip address) to
send the traps from.
My problem is that the nodes have various fixed interfaces (both ethernet
and wireless) and some transient ones (tunnels)
On Thursday 17 February 2005 17:30, Robert Story wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 23:00:29 + David wrote:
> DG> > What os are you using?
> DG>
> DG> I am using linux (2.6).
>
> I suggest you grab 5.2.1, configure with --enable-mfd-rewrites, and see if
> that helps.
Currently Debian has 5.1.2-6 as t
On Wednesday 16 February 2005 20:40, Robert Story wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:50:18 + David wrote:
> DG> It would appear that CISCO routers have a feature (1) which allows the
> DG> ifindex values which are sent in SNMP responses to be persistant.
> [...] DG>
> DG> Is there a way to achiev
It would appear that CISCO routers have a feature (1) which allows the ifindex
values which are sent in SNMP responses to be persistant. Not having them
persistant causes a lot of chatter on products like OpenNMS (which I use use
to monitor a network of boxes all running Linux and net-snmp - Debi
I realise that this is a bit off topic for net-snmp, but I thought someone
here might know.
I need to put the geographic location of a box somewhere that it can
be retrieved centrally, and the boxes are already being polled for
SNMP data so it makes sense to use this mechanism if possible.
Th
On Friday 22 October 2004 13:33, Dave Shield wrote:
> AB> Simply add a community to the informsink line:
> AB>
> AB> informsink public
> AB>
> AB> should solve the timeout.
>
> But if you look at David's original report, he *did* have a community
> field as part of that entry:
>
Correct
>
On Friday 22 October 2004 09:27, Dave Shield wrote:
> > > Sounds like you need a warmStart trap as defined in rfc 1907 or
> > > thereabouts.
> >
> > Do you know how I generate that with a command line using net-snmp
> > so that I can include it in the startup sequence?
>
> The agent will automatica
On Thursday 21 October 2004 15:20, Carlos Cantu wrote:
> > So I thought how about sending out a trap as part
> > of the boot sequence so that it would get logged centrally. The
>
> question
>
> > is what that trap should be and whether there is a "standard" OID etc
> > that I can use?
>
> Sounds
I realise that this may not be strictly net-snmp related, but I thought that
someone here might know the answer.
I have a number of remote systems which are set up to reboot if they
lock up, or if some other problems are found, or of course of the power
blips.
This they do quite happily, but
I am in the process of upgrading my internal network to include IPV6,
and I already have snmpd (from the Debian unstable package of the
same name) installed.
I have IPV6 configured on one of the interfaces on a test machine,
and I tried with snmpwalk to see if there were any IPV6 data
available.
On Tuesday 20 July 2004 12:21, Dave Shield wrote:
> > OK, this is where I found that the file that the Debian package
> > provided for me and the FAQ and other documentation did not
> > seem to be talking about the same thing.
>
> Sort of.
> The Debian package is using the individual access control
On Tuesday 20 July 2004 10:18, Dave Shield wrote:
> > I went through the /etc/snmp/snmpd,conf file and filled in the
> > bits that it indicated for basic operations (or so I thought).
>
> But what did you change?
> In particular, what access control settings do you now have?
>
> See the FAQ entry:
I have recently installed the Debian (unstable) package for net-snmp, and
I went through the /etc/snmp/snmpd,conf file and filled in the bits that
it indicated for basic operations (or so I thought). But when I use snmpwalk
to inspect the tree all retrieve is the system object, and although it lis
18 matches
Mail list logo
