Dave,
Am Montag, 16. April 2007 13:59 schrieb Dave Shield:
> On 16/04/07, Florian Jauernig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > When using the "bulkwalk" method on a v2 session object and using
> > multiple OIDs to be walked..
>
> Errr is that allowed?
> I'm not too familiar with the perl APIs,
On 16/04/07, Florian Jauernig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When using the "bulkwalk" method on a v2 session object and using multiple
> OIDs to be walked..
Errr is that allowed?
I'm not too familiar with the perl APIs, but the command-line tools
"snmpwalk" and "snmpbulkwalk" only accept a
Dave,
unfortunately I am running into this (or similar) problem again, and I have
tracked into this a little deeper, and now I really think, that net-snmp is
not behaving correctly.
I am seeing the NonIncreasing error set even in case NonIncreasing should
not be set.
When using the "bulkwalk"
On 10/04/07, Florian Jauernig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just wanted to give you feedback that tweaking the code in the way you
> suggested now sets the Error correctly in the SNMP session object.
Thanks.
I've applied this change to the 5.3.x, 5.4.x and current development branches.
(And will
Hi Dave,
I just wanted to give you feedback that tweaking the code in the way you
suggested now sets the Error correctly in the SNMP session object.
This way I can work around the the misbehaving agents manually, althought I
would be very happy, if net-snmp could be more fault tolerant, so I do
On 05/04/07, Florian Jauernig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Note that the SNMP perl module does include a flag to control the
> > behaviour when such bogus results are returned:
>
> I already tried this - but unfortunately when creating session objects
> using "new" with the "NonIncreasing" key se
Dave,
many thanks for the really quick reply!
Am Donnerstag, 5. April 2007 16:51 schrieb Dave Shield:
> On 05/04/07, Florian Jauernig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > as I am not sure if I may open a bug for this on sourceforge I want to
> > present my problem on this list first. (This means that I
On 05/04/07, Florian Jauernig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> as I am not sure if I may open a bug for this on sourceforge I want to
> present my problem on this list first. (This means that I already looked
> through the opened bugs and have not found anything appropriate)
This isn't actually a bug
Hi List,
as I am not sure if I may open a bug for this on sourceforge I want to
present my problem on this list first. (This means that I already looked
through the opened bugs and have not found anything appropriate)
I have noticed the following problem using a selfcompiled 5.4 (x86_64) under
