2009/2/9 Rodolfo Leffa :
> .. I'm only implementing the GET
> operation. Now I'm doubt if I should implement GETNEXT, or it's okay to have
> an agent that don't reponse to this kind of requisition.
No - your agent *MUST* handle both GET and GETNEXT requests.
See RFC1905, section 4.2.More
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Dave Shield wrote:
> 2009/2/6 Rodolfo Leffa :
> >> > I'd like to deal with all requests to a subtree of my mib in a single
> >> > handler, but i don't know how to do it.
> >>
> >> Registering the root using 'netsnmp_register_handler()' does exactly
> >> this. But
2009/2/6 Rodolfo Leffa :
>> > I'd like to deal with all requests to a subtree of my mib in a single
>> > handler, but i don't know how to do it.
>>
>> Registering the root using 'netsnmp_register_handler()' does exactly
>> this. But it does mean that you have to deal with *everything* under
>> th
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 6:55 AM, Dave Shield wrote:
> 2009/2/5 Rodolfo Leffa :
> > is there a way to define multiples OID's in a single module extending the
> > agent??
>
> Yes.
> Most of the code under 'mibgroup' works this way.
> There are very few MIB modules that comprise just
> one single OID.
2009/2/5 Rodolfo Leffa :
> is there a way to define multiples OID's in a single module extending the
> agent??
Yes.
Most of the code under 'mibgroup' works this way.
There are very few MIB modules that comprise just
one single OID.
Have a look through this code, and see how it's
currently done.
Hi,
is there a way to define multiples OID's in a single module extending the
agent??
I'd like to deal with all requests to a subtree of my mib in a single
handler, but i don't know how to do it.
Can I somehow defines a generic OID, like 1,3,6,1,4,1,32624,1,X,X,X,X,X, ??
Where 'X' could represe
