Re: Help required wrt configuring serverRecvBuf parameter

2010-07-27 Thread Trupti V.Kulkarni
Hi all, Is there any way I can find the current value of 'serverRecvBuf' variable? Also, I guess I can set the value based on the machine's RAM? In that case, I'd like to know how can I find its current value. Thanks, Trupti On 19 July 2010 09:27, Trupti V.Kulkarni wrote: > Hi Wes, > > Thank y

Re: Help required wrt configuring serverRecvBuf parameter

2010-07-19 Thread Trupti V.Kulkarni
Hi Wes, Thank you for your reply. Is there any way I can find the current value of 'serverRecvBuf' variable? Also, I guess I can set the value based on the machine's RAM? In that case, I'd like to know how can I find its current value. Thanks, Trupti On 15 July 2010 19:50, Wes Hardaker wrote:

Re: Help required wrt configuring serverRecvBuf parameter

2010-07-15 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:08:57 +0100, "Trupti V.Kulkarni" > said: TVK> *serverRecvBuf INTEGER TVK> specifies the desired size of the buffer to be used when TVK> receiving incoming SNMP requests. If the OS hard limit is lower than TVK> the serverRecvBuf value, then this will be used i

Help required wrt configuring serverRecvBuf parameter

2010-07-14 Thread Trupti V.Kulkarni
Hello, Thank you for accepting my subscription for net-snmp. I have been trying to find out the reason for snmptrapd to drop traps, and found upon searching on Google that many have faced the same problem. I found that the parameter *serverRecvBuf* can be increased by specifying the value in *snm